LINGUIST List 18.645
|
Wed Feb 28 2007
Qs: Manner vs. Path Languages
Editor for this issue: Kevin Burrows
<kevin linguistlist.org>
|
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Jennifer
Culbertson,
Manner vs. Path Languages
Message 1: Manner vs. Path Languages
|
Date: 25-Feb-2007
From: Jennifer Culbertson <culbertsoncogsci.jhu.edu>
Subject: Manner vs. Path Languages
Dear Colleagues,
I am looking for information regarding the classification of languages as
path or manner languages. Specifically I'm interesting in Latin, Sanskrit,
Ancient Greek, Gothic, Old Norse, Old High German, Old Church Slavonic,
Avestan, Old Prussian, Akkadian. Information on other dead languages is
welcome.
Thanks for your help,
Jenny Culbertson
Johns Hopkins University
Linguistic Field(s):
General Linguistics
Historical Linguistics
Typology
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|
