* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 18.683

Mon Mar 05 2007

FYI: Computational Linguistics

Editor for this issue: Ania Kubisz <anialinguistlist.org>


To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
Directory
        1.    Helene Mazo, CLEF-QAst evaluation campaign - 2nd CFP


Message 1: CLEF-QAst evaluation campaign - 2nd CFP
Date: 02-Mar-2007
From: Helene Mazo <mazoelda.org>
Subject: CLEF-QAst evaluation campaign - 2nd CFP


CLEF-QAst evaluation campaign
Second call for participation

QAst is a new CLEF-QA track that aims to provide an evaluation framework
for Question Answering technology (currently just factual QA) on speech
transcripts, both manual and automatic. A detailed description of this
track is available here: http://www.lsi.upc.edu/~qast.

The pilot track is organized jointly by the Technical University of
Catalonia (UPC), the Evaluations and Language resources Distribution Agency
(ELDA) and Laboratoire d'Informatique pour la Mécanique et les Sciences de
l'Ingénieur (LIMSI).

The participation is free of charge.

Important dates:
- 30 January 2007: development set released
- 15 June 2007: evaluation set released
- 30 June 2007: submission deadline
- 20 August 2007: paper submission deadline
- 19-21 September 2007: workshop

If you are interested in participating please send an email to Jordi Turmo
(turmo_AT_lsi.upc.edu) with ''QAst'' in the subject line.

Best regards,

QAst organizers



Linguistic Field(s): Computational Linguistics
Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue




Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.