* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 18.824

Sun Mar 18 2007

Sum: Saussure on Word-Formation

Editor for this issue: Kevin Burrows <kevinlinguistlist.org>


To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
Directory
        1.    Bruno Maroneze, Saussure on Word-Formation


Message 1: Saussure on Word-Formation
Date: 17-Mar-2007
From: Bruno Maroneze <maronezebrunoyahoo.com.br>
Subject: Saussure on Word-Formation


Query for this summary posted in LINGUIST Issue: 18.522
Regarding Query: http://linguistlist.org/issues/18/18-522.html 

Dear colleagues,
I apologize for taking so long in sending you the summary of my request on
Saussure. I received the following responses:

Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy indicated his chapter 'Basic terminology', in P
Stekauer & R Lieber (eds) _Handbook
of Word-Formation_ (Springer, 2005).

Philip W. Davis told me about the chapter 2 of his Modern Theories of
Language (1973, Prentice-Hall), unfortunately now out of print.
Konrad Szczesniak suggested me the reading of Aronoff’s Fundamentals of
Morphology.

Shishir Bhattacharja kindly sent me his doctoral thesis, “Word formation in
Bengali”, in which he adopts a neo-Saussurean point of view.

Israel Cohen sent me interesting considerations on the etymology of idioms,
but as this is not my main area of interest, I ask you to contact him
directly (cohen.izzygmail.com), if you wish so.

Best regards,
Bruno O. Maroneze
Ph.D. Student
University of Sao Paulo, Brazil

Linguistic Field(s): Morphology

Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue




Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.