* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 19.1004

Tue Mar 25 2008

Review: Morphosyntax: Bazenga (2007)

Editor for this issue: Randall Eggert <randylinguistlist.org>

This LINGUIST List issue is a review of a book published by one of our supporting publishers, commissioned by our book review editorial staff. We welcome discussion of this book review on the list, and particularly invite the author(s) or editor(s) of this book to join in. To start a discussion of this book, you can use the Discussion form on the LINGUIST List website. For the subject of the discussion, specify "Book Review" and the issue number of this review. If you are interested in reviewing a book for LINGUIST, look for the most recent posting with the subject "Reviews: AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW", and follow the instructions at the top of the message. You can also contact the book review staff directly.
        1.    Randall Eggert, Review: Morphosyntax: Bazenga (2007)

Message 1: Review: Morphosyntax: Bazenga (2007)
Date: 25-Mar-2008
From: Randall Eggert <randylinguistlist.org>
Subject: Review: Morphosyntax: Bazenga (2007)
E-mail this message to a friend

Announced at http://linguistlist.org/issues/18/18-2839.html
AUTHOR: Bazenga, Aline Maria Pinguinha França
TITLE: Aspects de la syntaxe, de la sémantique et de la morphologie des verbes à
SERIES: Linguistics Edition 61
YEAR: 2007

Milena Slavcheva, Linguistic Modeling Department, Institute for Parallel
Processing, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia

The book is a monograph (dissertation), written in French, which suggests an
analysis of the morphosyntactic and semantic properties of French verbs bearing
the feature of complexity (trait de complexité). The class of complexity verbs
(verbes à /complexité/) includes lexical items known as ''symmetric'',
''reciprocal'' or ''collective'' verbs, but it is elaborated and enriched according
to the theoretical assumptions and empirical investigations described in the
book. The feature of complexity presupposes a ''plurality'' reading of the entity
formed by the verb lexeme and its arguments. On the morphosyntactic level this
particular meaning is articulated by structures having the following two
properties: 1) selection of an argument (subject or object) which is
obligatorily in the plural (or a collective nominal, or a coordinated phrase) 2)
in the absence of an argument in the plural (or having a plural reading) as
defined in property 1), selection of a complement, which is a prepositional
phrase correlated with another argument (subject or object), and the correlated
elements are interpreted as ''plural''. The two properties serve as the basis, as
the point of reference relevant to the entire analysis of the verb structures on
the levels of morphology, syntax and semantics, and the interdependence among them.

The monograph consists of seven chapters, an appendix (containing a list of the
French verbs analyzed throughout the study) and an extensive bibliography
related to the topic. A short summary in French and in Portuguese, as well as
lists of tables, graphics and abbreviations/notations, are provided at the
beginning of the book.

Chapter 1 is an introduction where Bazenga points out the objectives of the
study and the general issues related to the multi-level analysis of complexity
verbs and the language constructs associated with them. The aim of the author is
to explain the behavior of complexity verbs, keeping in mind the two properties
given above and formulating and testing hypotheses about the mechanisms of
meaning construction. Bazenga formulates eight hypotheses whose plausibility is
explored in the subsequent chapters.

Chapter 2 represents the methodology of composing the data base of verb
structures: the selection of parameters of the analysis, the selection of
lexical entries, and the technical aspects concerning the different
configurations of the database. The selection of analysis criteria, as well as
the data structuring, are based on the linguistic representation of verb
constructs within the framework of the Pronominal Approach (Blanche-Benveniste
et al. 1984) and the verb valency dictionary Proton. On the basis of the initial
classification of complexity verbs provided by the Pronominal Approach, 278
verbs have been selected from literature dedicated to verb syntax, as well as
from dictionaries. Bazenga points out that reformulations of the lexical data
base have taken place concerning the analysis parameters and the notation system.

In Chapter 3, the general properties of complexity verbs are surveyed and a
proposal for linguistic analysis is provided as a result of handling the
selected data. The verbs are grouped according to several parameters. First of
all the verbs are subdivided into five groups according to the number of
syntactic patterns in which each one of them can participate. The observation of
these classes allowed the author to define an abstract syntactic level
consisting of two zones, SUBJECT and OBJECT, where the elements contributing to
the complexity feature are positioned around the verb nucleus. In this way, the
points of anchoring the complexity feature in the neighborhood of the verb are
determined for the different types of expressions. In this chapter, the quality
of a complexity operator is attributed to all formal linguistic elements which
contribute to the complexity interpretation, that is, to the meaning of 'more
than one' or 'in one'. The complexity operators described are: derivational
affixes and verb stems marked by the complexity feature (e.g., entre-, com-,
group-, coupl-, etc.); prepositional phrases (e.g., il compare Nadine à Sophie
'he compares Nadine to Sophie'); constructions with SE, that is, containing the
reflexive clitic se; nominal phrases, positioned in the SUBJECT or OBJECT zone,
which are interpreted as 'plural': nominals in the plural, collective nouns,
coordinated ET phrases.

Chapter 4 is dedicated to the morphological aspects of the complexity verbs. The
internal morphological structure of the verb lexemes is analyzed in detail and
the verbs are grouped according to the morpheme that serves as the anchor of the
[+discrete] feature, related to the concepts of 'plural', 'more than one', 'in
one', 'collective', 'all', that is, concepts related to the complexity feature.

In Chapter 5, ''The syntax of complexity verbs'', three types of syntactic
structures are described in detail depending on the focused element in the
structure. The first type of syntactic structure is distinguished by the
presence of prepositional phrases. The verb constructs are classified according
to the type and variety of prepositions that can be collocated to the verb
lexeme so as to complete the complexity expression. The second type of syntactic
structure is where the clitic SE is involved. Structures interpreted as
'reciprocal' or 'pseudo-reciprocal' are related to the complexity feature. The
third type of syntactic structure is defined according to the internal structure
of the nominal phrases contributing to the complexity meaning. The analysis is
related to the category of NUMBER and its realizations via Noun Phrase
categories: NPplural, NPcollective and NPcomplex coordinated. It should be noted
that each issue related to the analysis of the syntactic structures in Chapter 5
is supported by very rich theoretical argumentation, as well as a practical
application in the form of data descriptors.

Chapter 6 extends the analysis of the complexity verbs to the semantic domain by
relating the morphosyntactic verb structures to conceptual structures. The
chapter deals with the semantic category of 'collective' in view of the
part/whole relation in the nominal, as well as the verbal domain. A
multidimensional approach is applied to the semantic description of events and
conceptual structures are built by integrating an 'attributive',
'participative', 'quantitative' and 'descriptive' dimension.

The final remarks of Chapter 7 consist of a short summary of the research work
presented in the book and some ideas for future work.

Bazenga's monograph is an example of a good description of a linguistic
phenomenon. The chosen linguistic entities, complexity verbs in French, are
analyzed on several linguistic levels: morphological, syntactic and semantic. On
each level there are vast general issues to consider, as well as specific
problems to solve. Bazenga manages to accommodate the local argumentation in the
global view of the problems. She surveys a number of approaches to each subtopic
relevant to the study and then states her own position as part of the overall
treatment of complexity verbs. She also manages to keep track of the
interdependence between the different levels of linguistic analysis providing a
logically structured representation of the linguistic phenomenon.

A merit of this piece of research work is the constant study of language data
and the application of the theoretical model in building a corpus (as Bazenga
calls it) of analyzed verbs. The exhaustive data representation, conforming to
given theoretical assumptions, is very important in justifying the whole

The book contains a very rich bibliography related to the topics and subtopics
of the study.

There are some typographic errors that should be mentioned. The book contains 52
tables and after Table 21 the numbering of the tables and the reference to table
numbers are incompatible. Fortunately, the tables always immediately follow the
text where they are referenced, so there is no confusion. What causes some
confusion, though, is the fact that in many of the sections representing data,
coloured print is supposed to be used for differentiating classes of data (as
stated in the text), but the print is just plain. There are also some spelling
errors, notation errors, a missing note (note 58 on p. 146).

Blanche-Benveniste, C., Deulofeu, J., Stéfanini, J. and Van den Eynde, K.
(1984). _Pronom et syntaxe. L'approche pronominale et son application en
français_ Paris: Selaf.

Milena Slavcheva is a specialist in building formal models of language for
software applications and in producing large-scale language resources (lexicons
and corpora). She is interested in the study and formal representation of
verb-centered structures at different levels of linguistic analysis, as well as
in the development of cross-linguistic components utilizable in the automatic
processing of language.

This Year the LINGUIST List hopes to raise $60,000. This money will go to help keep 
the List running by supporting all of our Student Editors for the coming year.

See below for donation instructions, and don't forget to check out our Fund Drive 
2008 LINGUIST List Circus and join us on our many shows!


There are many ways to donate to LINGUIST!

You can donate right now using our secure credit card form at  

Alternatively you can also pledge right now and pay later. To do so, go to:

For all information on donating and pledging, including information on how to 
donate by check, money order, or wire transfer, please visit:

The LINGUIST List is under the umbrella of Eastern Michigan University and as such 
can receive donations through the EMU Foundation, which is a registered 501(c) 
Non Profit organization. Our Federal Tax number is 38-6005986. These donations 
can be offset against your federal and sometimes your state tax return (U.S. tax 
payers only). For more information visit the IRS Web-Site, or contact your 
financial advisor.

Many companies also offer a gift matching program, such that they will match any 
gift you make to a non-profit organization. Normally this entails your contacting 
your human resources department and sending us a form that the EMU Foundation fills 
in and returns to your employer. This is generally a simple administrative procedure 
that doubles the value of your gift to LINGUIST, without costing you an extra penny. 
Please take a moment to check if your company operates such a program.

Thank you very much for your support of LINGUIST!


Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.