LINGUIST List 19.1391
|
Thu Apr 24 2008
Diss: Morphology/Socioling/Syntax: Abramowicz: 'Socioeconomic Aspec...'
Editor for this issue: Evelyn Richter
<evelyn linguistlist.org>
|
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Lukasz
Abramowicz,
Socioeconomic Aspects of Linguistic Variation in Polish
Message 1: Socioeconomic Aspects of Linguistic Variation in Polish
|
Date: 24-Apr-2008
From: Lukasz Abramowicz <abramowiczgmail.com>
Subject: Socioeconomic Aspects of Linguistic Variation in Polish
 E-mail this message to a friend
Institution: University of Pennsylvania
Program: Department of Linguistics
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2008
Author: Lukasz Abramowicz
Dissertation Title: Socioeconomic Aspects of Linguistic Variation in Polish
Linguistic Field(s):
Morphology
Sociolinguistics
Syntax
Subject Language(s): Polish (pol)
Dissertation Director:
William Labov
Dissertation Abstract:
This dissertation examines three sociolinguistic variables in Polish based
on data collected in two speech communities located 30 miles apart in the
Mazowsze region in central Poland: Warszawa (population 1.7 million) and
Popowo Kościelne (population 850).
The first variable examined is variation between antepenultimate and
penultimate stress in nouns primarily of Latin and Greek origin, e.g.,
matematyka 'mathematics'. The variable, which operates above the level of
social awareness, was found to display all the defining characteristics of
a stable sociolinguistic variable, including regular social and stylistic
stratification, age and sex effects, and social evaluation consistent with
the linguistic production data.
The remaining two variables involve the behavior of person/number agreement
marking: its variable attachment (chapter 5), and its interaction with
stress assignment when it attaches to verbs (chapter 6). The results
contradict common stereotypes and popular characterizations in the
literature according to which variable attachment has almost completely
disappeared from the language, and that it is a rural feature. The feature
is robustly present in the data in both communities, especially so in
Warszawa where it has acquired a new positive social evaluation: it is
particularly used by young well-educated speakers from the highest social
class. With respect to interaction with stress, the sociolinguistic
patterns discovered in the analysis bear a strong resemblance not to
variable attachment, but to the noun stress variation examined in chapter 4.
The findings presented in the dissertation are a strong argument in favor
of the non-lexicalist analysis of Polish person/number agreement marking.
At the same time, however, they confirm the analysis according to which
speakers of Polish have to posit competing grammars for the feature. Such
an analysis is also justified by historical developments in Polish syntax
and morphology.
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|
