LINGUIST List 19.1499
|
Tue May 06 2008
Qs: Specified Grammatical Features in CQP Form?
Editor for this issue: Catherine Adams
<catherin linguistlist.org>
|
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. steve
steinberg,
Specified Grammatical Features in CQP Form?
Message 1: Specified Grammatical Features in CQP Form?
|
Date: 04-May-2008
From: steve steinberg <steve steinberg.org>
Subject: Specified Grammatical Features in CQP Form?
E-mail this message to a friend
I am looking for a library of queries/macros that formally specify a large set of English grammatical features. For example, I would love to find Biber's famous 67 grammatical features defined in CQP (corpus query processor) form. But I'm not that picky. The format could be tgrep2, TIGERsearch, Nooj, etc. And instead of Biber's list, it could be any reasonably comprehensive list of grammatical features. What's important is that they are a) formally defined, and b) reasonably comprehensive. This would seem like a simple thing to find, but I've searched high and low for quite some time with absolutely no success. Your help would be very much appreciated. Thanks, Steve
Linguistic Field(s):
Computational Linguistics
Text/Corpus Linguistics
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|