LINGUIST List 19.1790
|
Wed Jun 04 2008
Qs: Periphrastic 'go'-based Passives in Gaelic
Editor for this issue: Catherine Adams
<catherin linguistlist.org>
|
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Philippe
Bourdin,
Periphrastic 'go'-based Passives in Gaelic
Message 1: Periphrastic 'go'-based Passives in Gaelic
|
Date: 03-Jun-2008
From: Philippe Bourdin <pbourdin yorku.ca>
Subject: Periphrastic 'go'-based Passives in Gaelic
E-mail this message to a friend
I am interested in gleaning information regarding the periphrastic passives involving the ''equivalent'' of 'go' in Scottish Gaelic and Manx. The sources that I have looked up (e.g. Calder, 1923 and Thomson in MacAulay, 1992) are useful and suggestive, but limited in depth and scope. I have not been able to find any sources (published in English, German, Russian or any Romance language) dealing more specifically with these constructions, which strike me as typologically idiosyncratic from a morphosyntactic point of view. I would very much appreciate any assistance in this search from colleagues well-versed in those languages. Topics of special interest are the genesis of these constructions, competition with alternative strategies for encoding passive voice, syntactic constraints (for instance possibility of an Agent NP), differences between Scottish Gaelic and Manx (my sense is that the verbal noun is in subject position in Gaelic, but not in Manx), etc. I would also very much appreciate any info regarding the specific semantics of the 'go' verbs involved (degree of deicticity and ability to function as verbs of 'becoming' in particular). Many thanks in advance.
Linguistic Field(s):
Typology
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|