LINGUIST List 19.1791
|
Wed Jun 04 2008
Qs: Dependency Grammar
Editor for this issue: Catherine Adams
<catherin linguistlist.org>
|
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Philipp
Cimiano,
Dependency Grammar
Message 1: Dependency Grammar
|
Date: 04-Jun-2008
From: Philipp Cimiano <cimianoaifb.uni-karlsruhe.de>
Subject: Dependency Grammar
 E-mail this message to a friend
Hi all,
As part of my research on semantics construction for dependency grammars, I
have come across differences in the way various versions of dependency
grammar model certain dependencies.
In particular, there seems to be variation with respect to how the
following ''relations'' are modeled:
- the relation between an auxiliary and a lexicalized verb
- the relation between a preposition, the modified (verb / noun) and the
prepositional object
- the relation between determiners and nouns
As there is a vast amount of literature on dependency grammar, I would be
very grateful for pointers to these differences and pointers to the literature.
I will post a summary of the answers received.
Thanks,
Philipp
Linguistic Field(s):
Syntax
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|
