* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 19.2225

Sun Jul 13 2008

Qs: Construct Definition for Language Tests

Editor for this issue: Dan Parker <danlinguistlist.org>


We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
Directory
        1.    Tobias Haug, Construct Definition for Language Tests


Message 1: Construct Definition for Language Tests
Date: 11-Jul-2008
From: Tobias Haug <tobias.haugsignlang-assessment.info>
Subject: Construct Definition for Language Tests
E-mail this message to a friend

Dear all,

I am contacting the list members with an inquiry on language testing. Those of
you who are involved in the process of language test development and/or
adaptation (both theory and practice) know that one important step in language
test construction is how the researcher defines (in correspondence with the
purpose of the test) the test construct, e.g., “language proficiency”,
“communicative competence” (e.g., Haynes; Canale & Swain; Bachman) or
“language comprehension”?

My test targets language comprehension in deaf children 4-8 years old. I am
acquainted with the most common theories on language acquisition, but for
those of you on the list who work in language test development, I was
wondering
on which theories you personally base your construct definition?

Any suggestions and ideas are welcome.

Many thanks in advance.

Greeting from sunny Zurich, Switzerland.


Tobias Haug

Linguistic Field(s): Applied Linguistics
                            Language Acquisition

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue




Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.