LINGUIST List 19.2225|
Sun Jul 13 2008
Qs: Construct Definition for Language Tests
Editor for this issue: Dan Parker
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
Construct Definition for Language Tests
Message 1: Construct Definition for Language Tests
From: Tobias Haug <tobias.haugsignlang-assessment.info>
Subject: Construct Definition for Language Tests
E-mail this message to a friend
I am contacting the list members with an inquiry on language testing. Those of
you who are involved in the process of language test development and/or
adaptation (both theory and practice) know that one important step in language
test construction is how the researcher defines (in correspondence with the
purpose of the test) the test construct, e.g., “language proficiency”,
“communicative competence” (e.g., Haynes; Canale & Swain; Bachman) or
My test targets language comprehension in deaf children 4-8 years old. I am
acquainted with the most common theories on language acquisition, but for
those of you on the list who work in language test development, I was
on which theories you personally base your construct definition?
Any suggestions and ideas are welcome.
Many thanks in advance.
Greeting from sunny Zurich, Switzerland.
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.