* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 19.2593

Sat Aug 23 2008

TOC: Studia Logica 88/2 (2008)

Editor for this issue: Fatemeh Abdollahi <fatemehlinguistlist.org>

Directory
        1.    Jasper de Vaal, Studia Logica Vol 88, No 2 (2008)


Message 1: Studia Logica Vol 88, No 2 (2008)
Date: 18-Aug-2008
From: Jasper de Vaal <jasper.devaalspringer.com>
Subject: Studia Logica Vol 88, No 2 (2008)
E-mail this message to a friend

Publisher: Springer
http://www.springer.com

Journal Title: Studia Logica
Volume Number: 88
Issue Number: 2
Issue Date: 2008


Main Text:

Symmetry as a Criterion for Comprehension Motivating Quine’s ‘New Foundations’
Author(s) M. Randall Holmes
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11225-008-9107-8
Pages 195-213

Three-Valued Temporal Logic Q t and Future Contingents
Author(s) Seiki Akama, Yasunori Nagata and Chikatoshi Yamada
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11225-008-9102-0
Pages 215-231

Decomposability of the Finitely Generated Free Hoop Residuation Algebra
Author(s) Marta A. Zander
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11225-008-9103-z
Pages 233-246

Decidable Cases of First-order Temporal Logic with Functions
Author(s) Walter Hussak
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11225-008-9104-y
Pages 247-261

What is the Logic of Inference?
Author(s) Jaroslav Peregrin
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11225-008-9105-x
Pages 263-294

Proper Semantics for Substructural Logics, from a Stalker Theoretic Point of View
Author(s) Sato Kentaro
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11225-008-9106-9
Pages 295-324


Linguistic Field(s): General Linguistics
                            Semantics

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue




Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.