LINGUIST List 19.2739|
Tue Sep 09 2008
Qs: Syntactic Changes in Late Modern English Fiction
Editor for this issue: Dan Parker
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
Syntactic Changes in Late Modern English Fiction
Message 1: Syntactic Changes in Late Modern English Fiction
From: Cristiano Broccias <c.brocciasunige.it>
Subject: Syntactic Changes in Late Modern English Fiction
E-mail this message to a friend
Can you point us to any work on changes - if any - in narrative style in
English fiction writing in the Late Modern English Period (from
approximately the 17th century onwards)? Although we are currently focusing
on British English, information on either British or American English would
We are especially interested in changes which are reflected in syntax (e.g.
word order, sentence length, coordination vs. subordination, etc.). We are
aware of Biber and collaborators' work on historical shifts in styles in
spoken and written registers, but as far as we can tell this does not give
much specific information on changes in narrative style in fiction.
We will post a summary if we receive any answers.
Cristiano Broccias (c.brocciasunige.it)
Nick Smith (N.Smithsalford.ac.uk)
Ling & Literature
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.