LINGUIST List 19.2754|
Wed Sep 10 2008
Disc: Review of 'Chomsky's Minimalism'
Editor for this issue: Catherine Adams
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
Review of 'Chomsky's Minimalism'
Message 1: Review of 'Chomsky's Minimalism'
From: Wolfram Hinzen <wolfram.hinzendur.ac.uk>
Subject: Review of 'Chomsky's Minimalism'
E-mail this message to a friend
One would like to see the empirical evidence for the 'fact' that semantics
goes before syntax, or that we first 'think', and then 'speak', as stated
in LINGUIST discussion issue number 19.2747 (link below). There is, as far
as I know, no evidence, in fact, that semantics of the human kind is
possible in the absence of a suitable syntax or generative system that
supports such a semantics. If so, semantics, not only cannot, but must come
after syntax, and it is a genuine insight of the generative tradition that
what kinds of semantic interpretations we get, systematically depends on
which syntactic structures a mind can and does compute. The idea that
thoughts can be generated in a language-less mental nirvana, and then get
somehow 'translated' into language, is a philosophical myth that arose with
the Cartesian rationalist tradition.
To see the previous thread(s) in this discussion, please visit:
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.