LINGUIST List 19.2763
|
Thu Sep 11 2008
Confs: General Linguistics,Phonology,Semantics,Syntax/USA
Editor for this issue: Ania Kubisz
<ania linguistlist.org>
|
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Peter
Jenks,
Comparing Prosodies Grammatically: A Workshop
Message 1: Comparing Prosodies Grammatically: A Workshop
|
Date: 10-Sep-2008
From: Peter Jenks <pjenks fas.harvard.edu>
Subject: Comparing Prosodies Grammatically: A Workshop
E-mail this message to a friend
Comparing Prosodies Grammatically: A Workshop Date: 20-Sep-2008 - 20-Sep-2008 Location: Cambridge, MA, USA Contact: Peter Jenks Contact Email: pjenks fas.harvard.edu Meeting URL: http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~lingdept/comparingProsodiesgrammatically.html Linguistic Field(s): General Linguistics; Phonology; Semantics; Syntax Meeting Description: A one day workshop of papers dealing with prosody and its interfaces with syntax, semantics, and phonology. 10:00-10:40 Shinichiro Ishihara: ''Independence of Focus from Prosodic Phrasing: Evidence from Japanese'' 10:40-11:20 Peter Jenks (Harvard University): ''Prosodic boundaries and the Thai right periphery'' 15 minute break 11:45-12:35 Arsalan Kahnemuyipour and Jaklin Kornfilt: ''The Syntax-driven Prosody of Turkish 'Pre-stressing' Suffixes'' 12:35-1:15 Beste Kamali (Harvard University): ''Scope-prosody correspondence and the major phrase in Turkish'' Lunch 2:15-2:55 Victor Manfredi: ''APIP and early spellout in Benue-Kwa (Niger-Congo)'' 2:55-3:35 Andrew Nevins (Harvard University): ''FIFTH Street but Fourth AVENUE, and other nominal-internal anaphoric deaccenting puzzles'' 15 minute break 3:50-4:30 Michael Wagner (Cornell/McGill) & Serena Crivellaro Cornell):''Interpreting Prosodic Boundaries'' 4:30 General Discussion
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|