LINGUIST List 19.3207|
Wed Oct 22 2008
Qs: Phonetic Modification: Human-Machine Dialogue
Editor for this issue: Dan Parker
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
Phonetic Modification: Human-Machine Dialogue
Message 1: Phonetic Modification: Human-Machine Dialogue
From: Ekaterina Snugina <katjas85mail.ru>
Subject: Phonetic Modification: Human-Machine Dialogue
E-mail this message to a friend
I am a member of a team which is doing research on machine-human
communication for use in IVR systems. In developing our system, we have
faced several problems concerning the effectiveness of communication
between a person and an electronic ''voice''.
The first problem is a psycholinguistic one. How to make the machine to
carry on an effective dialog (the lexical, phonosemantic, stylistic etc.
components of the effective human-computer dialog)?
The second problem is the way the voice volume influences phonetic
processes (for example, phonetic modifications while whispering or shouting).
Does anyone know of any research on this problem? I did not manage to find
anything very useful on the web, and since we are in Russia it is difficult
to get contemporary linguistic literature from libraries. I will be very
grateful for any information.
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.