LINGUIST List 19.3329
|
Mon Nov 03 2008
Calls: Discipline of Ling/General Ling/Current Issues in Langua...(Jrnl)
Editor for this issue: Susanne Vejdemo
<susanne linguistlist.org>
|
LINGUIST is pleased to announce the launch of an exciting new feature: Easy Abstracts! Easy Abs is a free abstract submission and review facility designed to help conference organizers and reviewers accept and process abstracts online. Just go to: http://www.linguistlist.org/confcustom, and begin your conference customization process today! With Easy Abstracts, submission and review will be as easy as 1-2-3!
|
Directory
1. Jodie
Keyse,
Current Issues in Language Planning
Message 1: Current Issues in Language Planning
|
Date: 03-Nov-2008
From: Jodie Keyse <jodie.keyse tandf.co.uk>
Subject: Current Issues in Language Planning
E-mail this message to a friend
Full Title: Current Issues in Language Planning
Linguistic Field(s): Computational Linguistics;Discipline of Linguistics;General Linguistics;Language Documentation;Text/Corpus Linguistics
Call Deadline: 01-Jun-2009
Current Issues in Language Planning (ISSN 1466-4208), published by Multilingual Matters since 2000, provides major summative and thematic review studies and book reviews, spanning and focusing the disparate language policy and planning literature related to: Polities & Language Planning (2 numbers); Issues in Language Planning (2 numbers) a year. CILP is announcing a Call for Papers for a forthcoming issue on 'Language Planning and information technologies'. The Editor for this issue is Tony Liddicoat unisa.edu.au>. It is anticipated papers will be published in Vol 11,1. 2010. Information technologies have had a considerable impact on language use in recent decades. The development of new technologies has often been undertaken without consideration of language issues, and this has meant that language-planning work has been needed to integrate new technologies into existing language ecologies. At the same time, technology developers, especially software developers, have become aware of some of the language issues relevant to the uptake and use of their products. Information technologies have also been seen as a way of democratising communication, and this has afforded many language communities new ways to develop, promote and use their languages in the public domain. Modern information technologies are characterised by rapid change involving a continuous cycle of innovation, replacement and obsolescence of technologies which further complicates language planning work. These developments have required responses from government and from various institutions to respond to the issues to which the development of new technologies have given rise. The focus of planning for language issues revolving around technology includes, but is not limited to: - The planning of language and literacy capabilities required to access and use technologies, including issues relating to the 'digital divide'. - The development of technologies to support languages and to permit access to technologies through particular languages. - The use of technology to achieve language planning goals in areas such as education, language maintenance, prestige planning, etc. - Corpus planning for the language of technology. This volume seeks to canvass the range of technology related issues which confront contemporary language planners and to profile work in this field. The deadline for receipt of abstracts is 31 January 2009. The deadline for receipt of the final paper is 1 June 2009. Call for Books for Review Authors are encouraged to submit books for review in the journal. Please contact Professor Martin Pütz uni-landau.de> Potential contributors should consult the Guidelines for Authors for appropriate style. Other information about the journal which may be found on the website: http://www.cilp.net/
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|