LINGUIST List 19.3592
|
Sun Nov 23 2008
TOC: Lexis 2 (2008)
Editor for this issue: Fatemeh Abdollahi
<fatemeh linguistlist.org>
|
Directory
1. Denis
Jamet,
Lexis Vol 2 (2008)
Message 1: Lexis Vol 2 (2008)
|
Date: 23-Nov-2008
From: Denis Jamet <denis.jamet libertysurf.fr>
Subject: Lexis Vol 2 (2008)
E-mail this message to a friend
Publisher: Université Jean Moulin
http://facdeslangues.univ-lyon3.fr
Journal Title: Lexis
Volume Number: 2
Issue Number:
Issue Date: 2008
Subtitle: Lexical Submorphemics
Main Text:
Dear linguists, I am glad to announce that the second issue of LEXIS E-Journal in English Lexicology on "Lexical Submorphemics" has just been published. The articles can be found at http://screcherche.univ-lyon3.fr/lexis/spip.php?article96. Table of contents: a. Dennis Philps, Université Toulouse-Le Mirail (France) : Préface / Foreword b. Dennis Philps, Université Toulouse-Le Mirail (France) : Introduction c. Didier Bottineau, CNRS, MoDyCo - Université Paris 10 Nanterre (France) : "The submorphemic conjecture in English : towards a distributed model of the cognitive dynamics of submorphemes" d. Line Argoud, doctorante agrégée - Grenoble - Université de Toulouse-Le Mirail (France) : «Les 'mots en bl-' du lexique anglais : étude de la structuration des données dans une optique lexico-cognitive e. Jean-Marc Chadelat, IUFM de Paris (France) : «Le symbolisme phonétique: l'initiale des mots anglais : l'exemple du marqueur sub-lexical f. Ingrid Fandrych, National University of Lesotho (Lésotho) : "Submorphemic elements in the formation of acronyms, blends and clippings" g. Dennis Philps, Université Toulouse-Le Mirail (France) : "Submorphemic iconicity in the lexicon : A diachronic approach to English 'gn- words'" Best regards, Denis Jamet Editor
Linguistic Field(s):
Morphology
Lexicography
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|