LINGUIST List 19.3745
|
Sat Dec 06 2008
Confs: Morphology/Phonology/Netherlands
Editor for this issue: Stephanie Morse
<morse linguistlist.org>
|
LINGUIST is pleased to announce the launch of an exciting new feature: Easy Abstracts! Easy Abs is a free abstract submission and review facility designed to help conference organizers and reviewers accept and process abstracts online. Just go to: http://www.linguistlist.org/confcustom, and begin your conference customization process today! With Easy Abstracts, submission and review will be as easy as 1-2-3!
|
Directory
1. Doreen
Georgi,
The Divison of Labour between Morphology and Phonology
Message 1: The Divison of Labour between Morphology and Phonology
|
Date: 05-Dec-2008
From: Doreen Georgi <doreengeorgi gmx.de>
Subject: The Divison of Labour between Morphology and Phonology
E-mail this message to a friend
The Divison of Labour between Morphology and Phonology Date: 16-Jan-2009 - 17-Jan-2009 Location:Amsterdam, Netherlands Contact: Doreen Georgi Contact Email: doreengeorgi gmx.de Meeting URL: http://www.uni-leipzig.de/~exponet/meet.htm Linguistic Field(s): Morphology; Phonology Meeting Description: For many grammatical processes like reduplication it remains highly controversial whether they are primarily phonological or morphological in nature. The goal of this workshop is to discuss the division of labour among morphology and phonology in any relevant grammatical phenomena. This problem is addressed under theoretical, empirical, typological and diachronic aspects. Relevant phenomena include allomorphy, morpheme-specific alternations, infixation, morphological blocking, affix order, zero exponence, and processes in paradigms. The workshop will take place as a single joint event together with the fourth meeting of the Network Core Mechanisms of Exponence.
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|