* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 19.849

Thu Mar 13 2008

Diss: Phonetics/Phonology/Psycholing: McMillan: 'Articulatory Evide...'

Editor for this issue: Evelyn Richter <evelynlinguistlist.org>


To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
Directory
        1.    Corey McMillan, Articulatory Evidence for Interactivity in Speech Production


Message 1: Articulatory Evidence for Interactivity in Speech Production
Date: 13-Mar-2008
From: Corey McMillan <Corey.McMillaned.ac.uk>
Subject: Articulatory Evidence for Interactivity in Speech Production
E-mail this message to a friend

Institution: University of Edinburgh
Program: School of Philosophy, Psychology, and Language Sciences
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2008

Author: Corey T. McMillan

Dissertation Title: Articulatory Evidence for Interactivity in Speech Production

Dissertation URL: http://edgwiki.pbwiki.com/f/mcmillan_phd2008.pdf

Linguistic Field(s): Phonetics
Phonology
Psycholinguistics


Dissertation Director(s):
Robin Lickley
Martin Corley

Dissertation Abstract:

Traditionally, psychologists and linguists have assumed that phonological speech
errors result from the substitution of well-formed segments. However, there is
growing evidence from acoustic and articulatory analyses of these errors which
suggests activation from competing phonological representations can cascade to
articulation. This thesis assumes a cascading model, and investigates further
constraints for psycholinguistic models of speech production. Two major
questions are addressed: whether such a cascading model should include feedback;
and whether phonological representations are still required if articulation is
not well-formed. In order to investigate these questions a new method is
introduced for the analysis of articulatory data, and its application for
analysing EPG and ultrasound recordings is demonstrated.

A speech error elicitation experiment is presented in which acoustic and
electropalatography (EPG) signals were recorded. A transcription analysis of
both data sets tentatively supports a feedback account for the lexical bias
effect. Crucially, however, the EPG data in conjunction with a perceptual
experiment highlight that categorising speech errors is problematic for a
cascaded view of production. Therefore, the new analysis technique is used for a
reanalysis of the EPG data. This allows us to abandon a view in which each
utterance is an error or not. We demonstrate that articulation is more similar
to a competing phonological representation when the competitor yields a real
word. This pattern firmly establishes evidence for feedback in speech production.

Two additional experiments investigate whether phonological representations, in
addition to lower-level representations (e.g., features), are required to
account for ill-formed speech. In two tongue-twister experiments we demonstrate
with both EPG and ultrasound, that articulation is most variable when there is
one competing feature, but not when there are two competing features. This
pattern is best accounted for in a feedback framework in which feature
representations feedback to reinforce phonological representations.

Analysing articulation using a technique which does not require the
categorisation of responses allows us to investigate the consequences of
cascading. It demonstrates that a cascading model of speech production requires
feedback between levels of representation and that phonemes should still be
represented even if articulation is malformed.



This Year the LINGUIST List hopes to raise $60,000. This money will go to help keep 
the List running by supporting all of our Student Editors for the coming year.

See below for donation instructions, and don't forget to check out our Fund Drive 
2008 LINGUIST List Circus and join us on our many shows!

http://linguistlist.org/fund-drive/2008/

There are many ways to donate to LINGUIST!

You can donate right now using our secure credit card form at  
https://linguistlist.org/donation/donate/donate1.cfm

Alternatively you can also pledge right now and pay later. To do so, go to:
https://linguistlist.org/donation/pledge/pledge1.cfm

For all information on donating and pledging, including information on how to 
donate by check, money order, or wire transfer, please visit:
http://linguistlist.org/donate.html

The LINGUIST List is under the umbrella of Eastern Michigan University and as such 
can receive donations through the EMU Foundation, which is a registered 501(c) 
Non Profit organization. Our Federal Tax number is 38-6005986. These donations 
can be offset against your federal and sometimes your state tax return (U.S. tax 
payers only). For more information visit the IRS Web-Site, or contact your 
financial advisor.

Many companies also offer a gift matching program, such that they will match any 
gift you make to a non-profit organization. Normally this entails your contacting 
your human resources department and sending us a form that the EMU Foundation fills 
in and returns to your employer. This is generally a simple administrative procedure 
that doubles the value of your gift to LINGUIST, without costing you an extra penny. 
Please take a moment to check if your company operates such a program.

Thank you very much for your support of LINGUIST!


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue




Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.