* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 19.914

Tue Mar 18 2008

Confs: Ling Theories, Morphology, Phonology, Syntax/USA

Editor for this issue: Stephanie Morse <morselinguistlist.org>


To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
Directory
        1.    Robert Truswell, Semiproductivity in Grammar


Message 1: Semiproductivity in Grammar
Date: 17-Mar-2008
From: Robert Truswell <robert.truswelltufts.edu>
Subject: Semiproductivity in Grammar
E-mail this message to a friend

Semiproductivity in Grammar

Date: 03-May-2008 - 04-May-2008
Location: Medford, MA, USA
Contact: Robert Truswell
Contact Email: robert.truswelltufts.edu
Meeting URL: http://ase.tufts.edu/cogstud/welcome.html

Linguistic Field(s): Linguistic Theories; Morphology; Phonology; Syntax

Meeting Description:

A two-day workshop hosted by the Center for Cognitive Studies, Tufts University,
exploring semiproductivity in phonology, morphology and syntax from a variety of
theoretical perspectives

Some corners of language appear to be rule-governed and automatic, while others
appear arbitrary and idiosyncratic. However, many cases in all areas of grammar
fall between these two extremes. Such cases are sometimes referred to as
''semiproductive''. To use a famous example from morphology, the suffix '-en'
can successfully verbalize some adjectives to yield words like 'widen',
'redden', and 'blacken', but it fails to do the same thing to 'narrow'
('narrowen'), 'pink' ('pinken'), and 'green' ('greenen'). Similarly, we can say
things like ''take a look'' and ''take a sniff'' but not ''take a touch'' or
''take a smell''. In English phonology, Velar Softening (as in electri[k]-
electri[s]ity) has been discussed as a semi-productive process because it
applies only in certain morphological contexts and with certain lexical items
(cf. Blake - Blakism). In general, the symptom of a semiproductive rule is that
it states a generalization, but one must learn which cases this generalization
actually applies to.

The purpose of this workshop is to explore this elusive category of
generalizations at several levels of grammar (phonology, morphology and syntax)
with hope of getting a grip on such questions as:

Do semi-productive rules of the sort above have a special status or can they be
reduced to idiosyncratic cases that have to be memorized on a case-by-case
basis, or to regular rules enriched with additional structure (e.g.
probabilities, lexical indices, violable inheritance, etc.)?

What, if anything, do semi-productive rules have to do with notions of
frequency, markedness, optionality and regularity?

How can such rules be represented in the internal grammars and lexicons of the
speakers?

How can semi-productive rules be learned (e.g. how do learners come to
differentiate them from fully productive regular rules)?

Are such rules prone to regularize or are they relatively stable?

Speakers:
Adam Albright (MIT)
Harald Baayen (University of Alberta)
William Croft (University of New Mexico)
Peter Culicover (Ohio State University)
Adele Goldberg (Princeton University)
Laura Gonnerman (McGill University)
Rochelle Lieber (University of New Hampshire)
Donca Steriade (MIT)
Charles Yang (University of Pennsylvania)
Kie Zuraw (UCLA)

Registration is free, but please email robert.truswelltufts.edu or
katya.pertsovatufts.edu if you intend to participate.



This Year the LINGUIST List hopes to raise $60,000. This money will go to help keep 
the List running by supporting all of our Student Editors for the coming year.

See below for donation instructions, and don't forget to check out our Fund Drive 
2008 LINGUIST List Circus and join us on our many shows!

http://linguistlist.org/fund-drive/2008/

There are many ways to donate to LINGUIST!

You can donate right now using our secure credit card form at  
https://linguistlist.org/donation/donate/donate1.cfm

Alternatively you can also pledge right now and pay later. To do so, go to:
https://linguistlist.org/donation/pledge/pledge1.cfm

For all information on donating and pledging, including information on how to 
donate by check, money order, or wire transfer, please visit:
http://linguistlist.org/donate.html

The LINGUIST List is under the umbrella of Eastern Michigan University and as such 
can receive donations through the EMU Foundation, which is a registered 501(c) 
Non Profit organization. Our Federal Tax number is 38-6005986. These donations 
can be offset against your federal and sometimes your state tax return (U.S. tax 
payers only). For more information visit the IRS Web-Site, or contact your 
financial advisor.

Many companies also offer a gift matching program, such that they will match any 
gift you make to a non-profit organization. Normally this entails your contacting 
your human resources department and sending us a form that the EMU Foundation fills 
in and returns to your employer. This is generally a simple administrative procedure 
that doubles the value of your gift to LINGUIST, without costing you an extra penny. 
Please take a moment to check if your company operates such a program.

Thank you very much for your support of LINGUIST!


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue




Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.