Editor for this issue: <>
Quite independently of the content of Fritz Newmeyer's text (re: Functionalism and MT), which I have mutilated below for current purposes, isn't it interesting how often things like this appear on the net? Everywhere. Sometimes justified, sometimes not. It's so recurrent, it should become a smiley. > X writes that my bulletin board contribution exhibits Y. But the only > concrete example he gives to illustrate this is my supposed implication > that Z. I NEVER intended to imply such a thing and, rereading my piece, > I do not see how such an implication could be drawn from it. So, what are the rules that work in non-net dialogue but apparently fail on the net?Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I've been asked by a non-linguist colleague if I knew what the hypothesized homeland for the Munda language family is. I don't. But maybe someone out there does or knows where to find out. Thanks. Susan SteeleMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I'm asking on behalf of a visitor (Elizabeth de Kadt, from the University of Natal) whether anybody knows of anybody working on pragmatic issues with respect to Bantu languages, especially Zulu. (De Kadt herself is working on requests in Zulu.)Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I would like to request references to all typologically oriented grammars of Austronesian languages. This would include unpublished works (disser- tations, etc.) and work in progress. In particular I would like to know of any grammars of Philippine languages that seriously consider the ergative hypothesis. Thank you for your help. Tom Payne, University of OregonMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I would appreciate any bibliographic information on the topic of acquisition of clitics in romance languages. M.Christina GuidorizziMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
RUSSIAN on LISTSERVMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueASUACAD.BITNET A ListServ discussion group has been created to discuss Russian Language Issues, preferably in Russian. Topics include but are not limited to Russian language, linguistics, grammar, translations, literature. This list is geared toward students of Russian but, of course, _anyone_ who speaks/reads/writes Russian is invited and encouraged to participate. To subscribe to this list, send the following command to LISTSERV
ASUACAD on BITNET (in the body of mail or a message): SUB RUSSIAN your_name where your_name is your name as you wish it to appear on the subscription list (*not* userid at node). The name must include at the least a "first" and "last" name. For example, SUB RUSSIAN John Q. Public Thank you. Please direct questions and/or comments to the list owner, Andrew Wollert, at ISPAJW
ASUACAD.BITNET or ISPAJW
ASUVM.INRE.ASU.EDU.
LAST CALL FOR COSWL: At its May meeting, the LSA Executive Committee will be appointing new members to its various committees for terms beginning in January 1991. They will be appointing three new members to the Committee on the Status of Women in Linguistics (COSWL): two PhD's for terms of three years, and one student for two years. COSWL is submitting a list of people who are interested in serving on it, and who are prepared to put in a good deal of time doing so. We have already asked for volunteers, and we must send in our list immediately. However, there is time for last minute additions if people are quick. Anybody interested should send a message to Penelope Eckert (current chair of COSWL) at: eckert.parcMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuexerox.com, telling briefly why they want to be on COSWL. [Linguist List, Vol. 2, No. 128]