Editor for this issue: <>
as long as we're pushing back the date for nonsyntactic accounts of the coordinate structure constraint and violations thereof, may i point out susumu kuno's (1976) 'subject, theme, and the speaker's empathy' in li's subject and topic (academic press)?Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Ref: LINGUIST 2.13 (3). John Goldsmith <gldsmthMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuesapir.uchicago.edu> says: >I ... link this construction to one studied some years back by Lawler, >the one involved in answers such as "Not and stay sane, they can't" >to questions such as "Can linguists study negation?". The paper he refers to is entitled "Ample Negatives", and appeared in CLS 10 in 1974. The Q-A turn sequence he cites is the sentence that launched *my* paper.
anyone interested in non-syntactic explanations for the CSC, as well as arguments against movement rules, might also want to take a look at my 1974 Univ. of Texas at Austin dissertation - "The Role of Topic and Comment in Linguistic Theory", published in the Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics series in 1988. Jeanette Gundel, Univ. of MinnesotaMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue