Editor for this issue: <>
I'm interested in the application of philosophy of language theories to Old English poetry. I've done some work in speech act theory, and find it useful in helping to delineate interpretive boundaries in difficult passages, especially in elegies. The dynamics of time and space, as well as narrator and audience tend to become more clear. The limitation, of course, is that speech act theory is really only useful when there is either a clearly defined or strongly implicit speaker/audience relationship. Is anyone aware of research on similar applications of philosophy of language to Old English? I'm pretty familiar with the speech act applications, but if anyone knows of other types of language theories, I'd be grateful. I'd also be interested in knowing if anyone has done similar work in Old Norse, or has done comparative research in Old Norse and Old English. Well, at least this is a change from the weather. The above research project will help keep me in the airconditioned library during the heat and humidity of a Midwest summer. Thanks, Kate Emblom kemblomMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueiubacs
Philosophy of L I am finishing up a paper on the notion of topic in Austronesian linguistics and I would be interested in references to any theories designed to elucidate the difference between 'topics' in Philippine languages and 'subjects' in other languages that people may be familiar with. I am familiar with the theories of McKaughan (1957, 1958), Pike (1963), Bowen (1965), Hidalgo (1970), and Schachter (1976, 1977). I have also heard (and would appreciate any references to this) about an 'absolutive- ergative' analysis of Philippine languages.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Why is a polite threat more threatening than an impolite one? Why is "If I were you, I don't know as I'd ..." more ominous than "Don't"? Any ideas?Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue