Editor for this issue: <>
---(Forwarded from: Alexis Manaster RamerMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueWAYNEMTS.BITNET, Dated: Thu, 25 Jul 91 22:52:40 EDT)--- A query regarding the history of phonology: In the 1930's a Polish linguist named Stieber stated the principle that an analogical change could not produce a new phonemic contrast in a language. However, he does not claim any originality, so I wonder if anyone knows who first came up with this idea. Try as I might, I fail to find anything like it in the writings of Baudouin, Ulaszyn, etc. Also, if anyone has any comments on the validity of this law, I would be interested. In my 1981 dissertation "How abstruse is phonology?" I tried to debunk all the classic counterexamples to this law, and am thinking of publishing the relevant material soon.
I am preparing a brief article arguing that the well-known Kartvelian words mama 'father' and deda 'mother', celebrated for the way in which they reverse the expected sound-meaning mapping, are etymologically 'man' and 'woman', resp. I would be grateful for any information on the following: (a) Has anybody claimed this before? (b) Does anybody know other cases of mama-type words for 'father' or dada-type words for 'mother'? (c) Does anybody know of other cases where 'man' -> 'father' or 'woman' -> mother?Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
So does English now have a suffix '-gate'? Watergate Irangate Contragate Muldergate (South African) Inkathagate MargaretMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Thanks to Ken Whistler for his information on the politics of the encoding debate. One question: who is representing the interests of scholars who work on dead languages? King Alfred can hardly be expected to send a representative on behalf of Old English. Wes hal, Rick RussomMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue