Editor for this issue: <>
Latin Reflexives (?) In attempting to discover species of anaphor related to that in Martuthunira, an Australian language (see separate posting - if brave), I stumbled across an interesting example of the Latin reflexive possessive adjective 'suus' "his own": Ariovistus ad Caesarem legatos mittit uti ex suis (=Caesaris) aliquem ad se (=Ariovistum) mitteret "Ariovistus sent ambassadors to Caesar to ask that Caesar should send some one of his (Caesar's) men to him (Ariovitstus)." -- Mountford, J. (ed) (1938) Bradley's Arnold Latin Prose Composition. Paragraph 350. (And, incidentally, who is the pro in the bottom level clause? How do we know it's Caesar?) I approached a couple of classics scholars (who are not also linguists) and they were quite happy with the use of *se* in the example (the reflexive which here refers back to Ariovistus, the subject of some preceding clause), but were intrigued by the possessive *suis* referring back to a non-subject. I'm more interested (though having failed Latin at school) in the general properties of these so-called reflexives. As far as I can see, neither *se* or *suis* are anaphors under principle A of GB binding theory (given that they can generally find an antecedent outside their own (even finite) clause). My reading of orthodox Latin grammar suggests they both be "subjective", though perhaps not "nuclear" (in Bresnan's typology which also includes "logophoric" - eg. Icelandic long distance reflexive sig). I imagine someone(s) must have checked this out before. Any comments? Alan Dench Department of Linguistics University of Western Australia Nedlands, WA 6009 A_DENCHMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuefennel.cc.uwa.oz.au
I would appreciate pointers to publications which report on attempts to use as specification language a subset of natural language that can be translated into first-order predicate logic, or Horn clauses . Thank you. Norbert E. Fuchs Department of Computer Science University of Zurich CH-8057 Zurich Switzerland fuchsMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueifi.unizh.ch
Who first said when and where the oft-repeated "A language is a dialect with its own army and navy."? Thanks. George Huttar (huttarMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuetxsil.sil.org)