Editor for this issue: <>
Dr. Francis handles the corpus matters for Text Research. Phone 603-539-6356, fax 603-539-5445, e-mail HENRYMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueBROWNVM.BITNET - Julie Silverman
is it because _be being_ punches the role play rather than the more ambiguous simple durative of just plain _be_? `I'm being the mommy' is more explicit than `I'm the mommy' (which implies `I'm playing the role of the mommy' rather than actually being a mother). The thing is that am being, are being, is being are all very common, and so on, while _be being_, along with such constructions as _has been being_, will have been being, while grammatically possible, seem to many speakers to be stylistic violations and are therefore reduced. Be being does occur in speech and writing (I had some examples once but don't know where they've gone to) but it's decidedly rare.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
When I asked about linguistic terms in titles, I meant titles of novels. Sorry about the confusion. Chris cculyMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuevaxa.weeg.uiowa.edu