Editor for this issue: <>
Susan Fisher asks: > Someone from Australia told me that there is software "out there" that > lets you keep 2 lines together, as in word-for-word glosses. Does anyone > know more about these programs, and could they be submitted to the > software exhibit? I don't know about software to keep things together - that's the business of your word processor - but there are at least two programs that can help you construct parallel lines of annotations, etc., beneath an original source line. You supply the glosses and analyses; they do the alignment, and remember previous glosses when faced with a new line of input. The two I have in mind are the Summer Institute of Linguistics' (SIL) IT program, which does nothing but this, and their Shoebox program, which is a linguistic database (slip-base) program that includes glossing as part of its implementation of the slipping operation. Note that these are PC programs, though there is also a commercial version of IT for the Mac. I seem to recall a price above $300 US. IT is out of print, but used to cost c. $70 US. It is supposed to be due out in a new and final revision soon. Shoebox is in print, maintained by SIL's JAARS, and costs c. $14 US. Both programs have their virtues and flaws and work with non-proportional fonts only. That is, they align things with spaces, and assume that all characters, including space, are equal in width. SIL also sells an inexpensive set of TeX macros that can use IT output (and therefore also the similar Shoebox output, I suppose) to typeset interlinear material in proportional fonts. I don't recall the price for this, but it was $20-$30 or so. Doing the same task as these TeX macros in most word processors is virtually impossible. It involves setting up customized sets of tab stops for each bundle of lines, or reverting to nonproportional fonts. Please lobby your word processing vendors for this feature! Surely linguists aren't the only ones who can make good use of it! I have recently heard on the Nota Bene word processor listserv of a German program that does something similar to what IT and Shoebox do, using the metaphor of a musical score. It is apparently called Partitur. I have little or no information on it. In response to Fisher's plea, by all means let SIL demonstrate some of their numerous programs for linguists at LSA! Their stuff isn't perfect, but it is pretty good, and not widely enough known. Incidentally, the address for SIL products is: Academic Book Center Summer Institute of Linguistics 7500 W. Camp Wisdom Road Dallas, TX 75236 JAARS can be reached at: Software Librarian International Computer Services JAARS Box 248 Waxhaw, NC 28173 Note that most SIL-authored software that I am aware of is freely distributable, but the documentation is copyrighted, and has to be purchased from SIL. The documentation comes with the necessary diskettes. When ordering, specify what kind of diskettes (3.5 or 5.25) you need. If you are in a hurry, in the past the Academic Book Store has been willing to send invoices with the order, at least within the USA.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
For a review of software for working with corpora, see Knut Hofland's "Concordance programs for personal computers" in Johansson, Stig and Anna-Brita Stenstrom. English computer corpora. Selected papers and research guide. Tiel:Mouton de Gruyter, 283-307. The book has just been published. Jacques Noel's article in the same collection "Corpora and dictionaries in multiline records: A Unix/Awk approach to home=-made text retrieval (307-316) is also interesting.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Don't know if there are programs for psycholinguistic experiments but I think there are Mac programs under the more general heading psychology experments. Suggest you describe the kind of data you want to collect and query GENIE, America Online, Compuserve, etc. Meanwhile, you probablywill find the article in MacWorld Aug. '91 "Science and the Mac" of interest.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue