Editor for this issue: <>
Sometime during the spring or summer, a kind colleague responded to a query of mine by sending a list of Welsh body part terms borrowed from Latin. However, the header of his/her message had been messed up and the editors of LINGUIST were unable to identify him/her. Would this person please contact me again?Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I read somewhere that massive experiments designed to change usage were made during the early postrevolutionary period in Russia under strong centralized state control but that these had no effect on ordinary speech whatsoever. Anybody know the details? -- Rick RussomMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
If I may repeat a query I posted over the summer (hoping that some of you who were then on vacation will be able to help), I am trying to find out who first proposed that analogical processes may NOT affect the phonemic system of a language (create new phonemes, redistribute allophones, etc.). The earliest formulation of this I now know is by the Polish linguist Stieber (first name Zdzislaw, I think) in the 1930's, but he does not sound as though he thought this up. And I am SURE it was NOT Max Weinreich.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue