Editor for this issue: <>
In response to the query of Jean Veronis <VERONISMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueVASSAR.BITNET> about disjunctive feature descriptions, I also addressed the problem of how to avoid expansion to disjunctive normal form in a paper presented at ACL-87: Kasper, Robert. A Unification Method for Disjunctive Feature Descriptions. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Stanford University, July 6-9, 1987. Also available as USC/Information Sciences Institute Reprint RS-87-187. The data structure for disjunctive feature descriptions that I present in that paper can be regarded as a particular normal form that localizes disjunctive information (for arbitrary disjunctive descriptions), and the results of unification are also kept in that form. I didn't explicitly address the formatting of the results in the paper, but those data structures correspond quite directly to the form you desire, and they are easy to translate into the type of human-readable form that you suggest. Bob Kasper Dept. of Linguistics INTERNET: kasper
ling.ohio-state.edu Ohio State University 204 Cunz Hall 1841 Millikin Rd. Columbus, OH 43210 (U.S.A.)
Yes but what has this to do with the cost of bread or to paraphrase - is this in aywa connected with what ordinary people do with language can all this Boolean logic contribute somewhere or is it just cleverness for its own sake - linguistics away from the social or even the psychological? I do not mean to be disrespectful - I just wonder! John WheatleyMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue