Editor for this issue: <>
Can anyone suggest a name for the class of words in English that is used in the situation where you can't remember the name for something? I mean the words like doohicky, thingamabob, thingummy, thingamajig ... I am provisionally calling them 'nonsense filler words', but I'd be interested to know if any one has discussed them.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
could anyone recommend any work on the category 'person'? linguistic, crosslinguistic, acquisition, processing, anything. thanks.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
warning long query! I am doing a dissertation on 'singular they', ie. THEY coreferent to a formally singular non-collective NP. I noticed in preparing a history of English class that in one version of the Canterbury tales (the Signet Classic by Donald How- ard) that although what is normally (mis)called 'generic he' predominates, there is one example of singular they in the prologue to the Pardoner's Tale (lines 57-59) And WHOSO (=whoever) findeth HIM out of swich blame/THEY wol coome up and offre in Goddes name/And I assoile(=absolve) HIM by th'auctoritee... Checking another cheapo paperback edition (A. C. Cawley's Everyman) the same verses have all 'generic' masculines. And this is the version found in the more authoritative editions apparently. Our Chaucer teacher assures me that in her edition that contains all textual variants, she only finds 'generic' mascu- lines inthse verses. So it would seem that someone made a mistake with one word No big deal right? Yet another of the paperbacks contains the following rendition of the se same lines: And WHO SO fyndeth HIM out of swich blame/ THEY will come up and offre in Goddes name and I assoille HEM (=them) by the auctoritee... (from K. Kee's Geoffrey Chaucer: a selection of his works.) My Chaucer expert friend assures me that she has no idea of where these 3plurals are coming from, and she gave me an address of someone who might know, but so far he hasn't responded. So I am appealing generally to see if anyone has an idea or who I might ask.Or if anyone knows of any examples of this older than those in the OED. Probably it would be best to respond directly to me rather than burdening the list with what is probably not of general interest. THANKS Michael Newman.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue