Editor for this issue: <>
I have just learned that the April issues (which may already be available to those with subscriptions) of The Atlantic and Scientific American have major stories on some of the research on language families such as Nostratic, Sino-Caucasian, but also (sigh!) Amerind and "World". I think even professional linguists may find these informative (in the case of the Sc. Am. story, I would vouch for its overall accuracy; the other one I have not seen at all). There was also a very informative story on this in USNews in November (into which certain, rather unimportant, inaccuracies did creep in (for example, it attributes to Sergei Starostin the claims that Sino-Caucasian is related to Basque and to Na-Dene, neither of which have anything to do with him)). I happen to like that story because it made the point (which I am afraid I am responsible for) that, if major breakthroughs like these in comparative linguistics turn out to be vindicated, then that would have important implications for the way linguistics will look into the 21st century.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
For those interested in the work on North Caucasian (which in turn is hypothesized to belong in a proposed Sino-Caucasian family), I would recommend a look at: I. M. Diakonoff andf S. A. Starostin, 1986, Hurro-Urartean as an Eastern Caucasian Language, Munich: Kitzinger. At last, something in English and in print!Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue