Editor for this issue: <>
Re the linguistic and communicative strategies query posed by Carlson, you might want to look at some things that Steve Boggs worked on at least 15 years ago at the University of Hawaii. I'm afraid I don't know if or where they were published, but it was under the aegis of Kamehameha Schools. Susan FischerMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Concerning T. Shannon's request: I have used a Mac for years in my linguistics research and think that far and away the best all-purpose tool is Fourth Dimension. The best way to start, however, may be with FileForce, a subset of 4D, which is considerably cheaper and would probably answer all your needs. If not, you can upgrade to 4D. You may also want one of the excellent statistics programs like Systat although from the description of what you're doing, I would think the excellent DeltaGraph from DeltaPoint would meet your needs. You can order both from MacConnection 1-800-800-4444 and doubt- less from other mail order houses. BelmoreMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueVax2.Concordia.Ca
A colleague has suggested "reprise interrogative". So far no one has come up with a translation of "code switching".Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
My suggestion for Tom Shannon is "Panorama," a flat database which is very powerful but is easy to use. I have used it for over a year with great results. There are still features I haven't used yet, but the basic operation is simple. Moroever, PROView supplies booklets and video tapes to help folks learn it. Peter GingissMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
For information and further references on cross-cultural communicative strategies, you might look at: Donal Carbaugh, ed. Cultural Communication and Intercultural Contact. 1990. Lawrence Erlbaum.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Thanks to all the people who wrote to explain the effect of helium on the voice to me. There was a bit of difference of opinion, but the majority (and most convincing to me) explanation goes something like this -- Helium is less dense than air, therefore the speed of sound in helium is faster. Since faster sound equals higher frequency, helium speech is higher than ordinary speech. (I hope I haven't muddled this recount!) I considered bringing helium balloons to class to let the students try it, but I decided I couldn't get it past the human subjects board. :-) Aaron BroadwellMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue