Editor for this issue: <>
A month or several ago I noticed my 15-year-old daughter Susannah Mandel using this construction and asked her about it. She gave me a one-line reference, which she has just expanded at my request in response to Larry's query. I typed as she talked, and have edited the result somewhat, subject to her approval. Here is her analysis. This usage originated on the regular "Wayne's World" sketch on Saturday Night Live. The sketch is supposedly a show on a local cable station in Aurora, Illinois, produced by 2 college kids, Wayne (Mike Myers) and his buddy Garth (Dana Carvey), out of Wayne's basement. It features their teenage American dialect, peppered with terms such as "Excellent!", "Party on, dude", "He shoots, he scores!"[context- specific to the sketch], "Okayyy! Alll righht!", and this "Not!" (Direct quotation of Susannah:) "Anyone hip enough to watch Saturday Night Live will be able to use it. You can use it to cancel your own statement in a self-derogatory way, or you can use it on somebody else. It's not really insulting, more of a disagreement, meant to express a difference of opinion (although Wayne and Garth are insulting to each other, because it's their attitude)." (1) Context: You and some friends see this guy walking by. One of you says, "Oh God, he's really hot. (pause a few beats) NOT!!(very emphatic)" and everybody laughs, everybody breaks up. (2) Context: You're just walking along talking to someone. A: "I'll see you at the mall tonight." B: "Not.(in conversational tone) I'm grounded. I can't go." I.e., no, you're wrong, I can't go. To really insult someone's opinion you wouldn't use that, because it's actually genial and friendly, even though on occasion you say it in a loud, insulting voice. "It's really quite friendly; it's not insulting... it's not, umm, *nasty*." It's insulting only when you say it about someone else, not when you say it about your own statement or the person you're talking to's. Everybody uses it in form (1), but only some people use form (2); it's dialectal. People are more likely to use it to negate their own statements than someone else's. [Sounds like a classic Labovian implicational ordering.] -- As further context, we live in Framingham, Massachusetts, a large town in the suburban area between Boston and Worcester.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
The use of NOT reported in the last few days (and I should point out that this is totally alien to Australians - at least to date, but Bill and Fred or whoever are onour big screens too) reminds me very much of a pattern in some Australian languages. In Kurrama, Yinyjiparnti and Panyjima (at least), of North West Western Australia, a declarative statement can be followed by a raspberry - that is, an egressive velaric bilabial trill (and it is velaric, in case you're wondering). Or alternatively, by the word "thumpirr", in which the last consonant is an alveolar trill, often voiceless and prolonged in this usage. The word means fart, and perhaps the best characterisation is that the speaker is indicating that the last statement was as if he (and I've only heard men using this) were talking through his arse. It can be sarcastic, ments and then back off from these. And it appears to me that sarcasm is, for these people, quite outrageous, very impolite (to the point of dangerous), and so needs some qualification. Alan Dench Linguistics University of Western Australia A_DENCHMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuefennel.cc.uwa.oz.au
re S. Fisher's speculation that this is a californianism: I haven't heard it among my students or my younger friends. (Of course, like all modern literati, I've heard it on "Wayne's World" and the Budweiser commercial.) --C. Brugman, UCSD (and a lifelong Californian who bridles at these blanket accusations!)Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
While it may well be true that the current use of post-affirmative "not" comes from Bill and Ted's Big Adventure/Wayne's World, it's certainly not new. As a young adolescent in the mid 60's, my peers and I (well, at least the female peers) used this construction quite a lot. (This was a in a small town in Iowa.) Does anyone know of/remember using it prior to the 1960's? Sarah Jones Indiana University--Bloomington saajonesMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueiubacs.bitnet saajones
ucs.indiana.edu
I don't remember too much Czech, but I can certain vouch for the fact that it is very common in German to put an article before someone's name. I don't believe the perscriptive grammarians have accepted it yet, but in speech it's very normal to speak of someone as "der Donald" or "die Ivana." Seems logical that other languages would do this as well....as to the best of my recollection Czech is one of these languages. JG --Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I just had a thought. Maybe the source of S+Not is Hawaiian English. As I recall, "Not" is used as a one-word response to deny what one's interlocutor has just said. Susan FischerMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
...not! Compare hawaiian creole english final ...but! (See Pidgin to da max or any standard source). Given the California Surf community interactions with the Hawaiian surfers, who borrow expressions from Hawaiian Creole English, there is a plausible borrowing source. I make no claims, just a suggestion for researcgh - in the field, if possible! Eric Schiller University of ChicagoMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
A correction of my original response to Larry Horn's query about sarcastic post-affirmative NOT: I watched the movie BILL AND TED'S EXCELLENT ADVENTURE and found no examples of the relevant construction, though it's the model for WAYNE'S WORLD in many other ways, as my students reported, for instance the phrase PARTY ON, and the overuse of EXCELLENT. Apparently it can not only follow a pause, but even an intervening turn by the addressee as in the constructed sequence below. A: I really like that tie you're wearing. B: Gee, thanks. A: NOT! Neal R. Norrick, tb0nrn1Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueniu.bitnet