Editor for this issue: <>
One place where one can find occasional counterfeeding orders is
in the rules governing English casual speech. In my English, for
example, geminate /tt/ can be simplified to single (unaspirated)
{t}, which ought to make it available for flapping, but flapping
in those cases sound `too sloppy'. Examples as follows:
`syntactic' can become, by assimilation {sIntattIk}, which can
be pronounced {sIntatIk}, but {sIntaDIk} is overly sloppy-sounding.
Similarly, `rent-to-own' is OK as {rEntuoun} but {rEnDuoun} is
terrible. My suspicion is that there are lots of cases where
counterfeeding orders are more `careful' or precise, and reordering
is either possible or not depending on individual or social factors.
I think David Stampe originally noticed this kind of data.
Geoff Nathan <ga3662
siucvmb.bitnet>
Southern Illinois University at Carbondale
Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
>Date: Sat, 7 Dec 1991 09:15 EST >From: MORGANMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueLOYOLA.EDU >Subject: Re: 2.846 Queries: Ling. Dictionary, Texas Ling. Forum, Reduplication > > >Re reduplication: I'm not quite sure how far you wish to carry >the idea, but a nickname for "Luigi" in Italian is "Gigi", which >would be AB ==> BB. > >L Morgan it's bigger than 'luigi', now that i think of it. in egyptian french (which often dips into italian in naming practices), you get the following diminutives (some of them also occur in continental french, i believe): andre'e: de'di [masc. andre' is douri; in continental french it's de'de'.] isaac: zizi joseph: sousou, zouzou victor: toto salomone': none' raphaele: lello jacqueline: kiki sophie: fifi ... and then there's good ol' robert: bob(by).
The reduplication in nicknames (esp. family nicknames) could be derived from very young children's speech, in which there is often word-structure simplification such as converting an adult form with more complex structure into reduplicated CVCV. The selected CV tends to be more stressed, or if there is no stress, more often either final, or initial, than medial. I am not sure of the generality of this phenomenon in a variety of languages. Susan Ervin-Tripp ervin-trMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuecogsci.berkeley.edu