* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 20.1533

Wed Apr 22 2009

Diss: Semantics/Syntax: Beynen: 'A Comparative Semantic Analysis of...'

Editor for this issue: Evelyn Richter <evelynlinguistlist.org>

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
        1.    Gijsbertus Koolemans-Beijnen, A Comparative Semantic Analysis of Contemporary Standard Russian and Polish Word Order

Message 1: A Comparative Semantic Analysis of Contemporary Standard Russian and Polish Word Order
Date: 05-Mar-2009
From: Gijsbertus Koolemans-Beijnen <kesaphelaaol.com>
Subject: A Comparative Semantic Analysis of Contemporary Standard Russian and Polish Word Order
E-mail this message to a friend

Institution: Stanford University
Program: Department of Linguistics
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 1968

Author: Bert K. Beynen

Dissertation Title: A Comparative Semantic Analysis of Contemporary Standard Russian and Polish Word Order

Linguistic Field(s): Semantics

Subject Language(s): Polish (pol)
                            Russian (rus)

Dissertation Director:
Cornelius H van Schooneveld

Dissertation Abstract:

The word order in both Russian and Polish is repeatedly reported to be
free, although apparently not any order is permissible. Proceeding from F.
de Saussure's assumption that a difference in form always is accompanied by
a difference in meaning, and vice-versa, one might expect that different
types of word order would differ semantically from each other. In the
literature we find only scant and unsystematic reference to a relation
between word order and meaning; only for a few seemingly unrelated cases
such a relation is given. This dissertation will try to elucidate the
relation between form and meaning in word order in Russian and Polish.

In Chapter II the most important syntactical theories are examined. The
main criticism is that they do not recognize the unity of the linguistic
sign and overemphasize either its formal or semantic aspect. Also, the
notion of 'normal' word order is criticized. The author favors van
Schooneveld's approach which consists in taking the relation
modifier-modified as the point of issue and attributing a certain meaning
to the preceding or the following of the modifier. Also, van Schooneveld
distinguishes a marked and an unmarked word order, depending on whether the
meaning of a certain type of word order is marked or unmarked. In this way
the terms 'marked' and 'unmarked' are more meaningful than the terms
'normal' and 'abnormal' as applied to word order.

The Polish translation of the Russian novel 'Anna Karenina' is compared
with the original. Differences in word order between the two novels are
noted, and a correspondence between word order and meaning is established,
proceeding from the assumption that, in a translation, both the original
combination of modified and modifier and its translation are identical in
meaning while possibly displaying a difference in word order.

In Chapters III-VII the main types of the combination modified-modifier are
examined. It is shown that both in Russian and in Polish a modifier
following its modified indicates that their combination can be recognized.
In Russian the speaker performs the recognition; in Polish the recognition
takes place on a more general basis. A modifier preceding its modified
indicates that recognition may or may not take place, and forms thus the
unmarked member in a binary privative opposition, the marked member being
the modifier following its modified.

In Chapters VIII-X the author examines special cases; Chapter XI contains
and application of the analysis, used in the preceding only with regard to
the relation modified-modifier, to sentence analysis.

Chapter XII contains a conclusion, in which the adequacy of the proposed
analysis is stressed once more. Also, the similarity is noted which exists
between affixes and words in their relation between order and meaning. The
chapter concludes with a proposal for a typology of languages based on the
fact that the connection between modified and modifier is established
differently for different languages.

This Year the LINGUIST List hopes to raise $60,000. This money will go to help 
keep the List running by supporting all of our Student Editors for the coming year.

See below for donation instructions, and don't forget to check out our Fund Drive 
2009 LINGUIST List Restaurant and join us for a delightful treat!


There are many ways to donate to LINGUIST!

You can donate right now using our secure credit card form at  

Alternatively you can also pledge right now and pay later. To do so, go to:

For all information on donating and pledging, including information on how to 
donate by check, money order, or wire transfer, please visit:

The LINGUIST List is under the umbrella of Eastern Michigan University and as such 
can receive donations through the EMU Foundation, which is a registered 501(c) Non 
Profit organization. Our Federal Tax number is 38-6005986. These donations can be 
offset against your federal and sometimes your state tax return (U.S. tax payers 
only). For more information visit the IRS Web-Site, or contact your financial advisor.

Many companies also offer a gift matching program, such that they will match any 
gift you make to a non-profit organization. Normally this entails your contacting 
your human resources department and sending us a form that the EMU Foundation fills 
in and returns to your employer. This is generally a simple administrative procedure 
that doubles the value of your gift to LINGUIST, without costing you an extra penny. 
Please take a moment to check if your company operates such a program.

Thank you very much for your support of LINGUIST!

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.