* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 20.1741

Wed May 06 2009

Confs: Language Acquisition/USA

Editor for this issue: Stephanie Morse <morselinguistlist.org>

LINGUIST is pleased to announce the launch of an exciting new feature: Easy Abstracts! Easy Abs is a free abstract submission and review facility designed to help conference organizers and reviewers accept and process abstracts online. Just go to: http://www.linguistlist.org/confcustom, and begin your conference customization process today! With Easy Abstracts, submission and review will be as easy as 1-2-3!
        1.    Cynthia Clopper, Multiple Perspectives on the Critical Period

Message 1: Multiple Perspectives on the Critical Period
Date: 05-May-2009
From: Cynthia Clopper <clopper.1osu.edu>
Subject: Multiple Perspectives on the Critical Period
E-mail this message to a friend

Multiple Perspectives on the Critical Period

Date: 05-Jun-2009 - 06-Jun-2009
Location: Columbus, OH, USA
Contact: Cynthia Clopper
Contact Email: < click here to access email >
Meeting URL: http://www.ling.ohio-state.edu/~springsym/

Linguistic Field(s): Language Acquisition

Meeting Description:

The Department of Linguistics at the Ohio State University will host a symposium entitled Multiple
Perspectives on the Critical Period for Language on June 5-6, 2009.

The traditional view of the critical period for language - going back to Lenneberg - is that it is part of a
biological process: the decline in language ability reflects a maturational change in brain development.
This view makes two strong predictions, namely, that children will be better at acquiring language than
adults and that short of some kind of brain disorder, there's no way to change that fact. This view has
been challenged in recent years in a variety of ways. Work on second language acquisition has found
that adults are not always worse than children in acquiring a language. Moreover, particularly in the
domain of phonology, there is evidence that second language learning can influence first language
representations, suggesting a continuity between the two processes. In addition, alternative
mechanisms to biological maturation have been suggested as ways to account for differences between
adults and children. Chief among these alternatives are computationally influenced models which appeal
to the radical differences in terms of specific domain knowledge and processing capacities through

We wish to address two related issues in this event: First, to what extent do language acquisition
abilities decline in adulthood? Second, to the extent that adults are worse than children in acquiring
language, what is the mechanism that causes this decline? The goal of the symposium is to bring
together scholars with a range of views and thereby foster debate and discussion.

The symposium will include invited talks by:
James Flege, University of Alabama, Birmingham
Silvina Montrul, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Ann Senghas, Barnard College
Jason Zevin, Sackler Institute

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.