* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 20.2106

Mon Jun 08 2009

Calls: Linguistic Theories, Syntax/Germany

Editor for this issue: Elyssa Winzeler <elyssalinguistlist.org>

LINGUIST is pleased to announce the launch of an exciting new feature: Easy Abstracts! Easy Abs is a free abstract submission and review facility designed to help conference organizers and reviewers accept and process abstracts online. Just go to: http://www.linguistlist.org/confcustom, and begin your conference customization process today! With Easy Abstracts, submission and review will be as easy as 1-2-3!
        1.    Joost Kremers, Linearization Workshop

Message 1: Linearization Workshop
Date: 08-Jun-2009
From: Joost Kremers <j.kremersem.uni-frankfurt.de>
Subject: Linearization Workshop
E-mail this message to a friend

Full Title: Linearization Workshop
Short Title: Lin2010

Date: 23-Feb-2010 - 26-Feb-2010
Location: Berlin, Germany
Contact Person: Joost Kremers
Meeting Email: < click here to access email >
Web Site: http://user.uni-frankfurt.de/~kremers/DGfS2010-Linearization.html

Linguistic Field(s): Linguistic Theories; Syntax

Call Deadline: 15-Aug-2009

Meeting Description:

This workshop deals with the question of linearization, the issue of relating a
hierarchical syntactic structure with a (predominantly) linear phonological

Call for Papers

In current minimalist thinking, syntactic representations are strictly
hierarchical and do not contain any information on the linear order of terminal
elements. Such an assumption obviously raises a number of questions, which this
workshop aims to address. Firstly, questions arise over the motivation of this
hypothesis, such as the following:

- What empirical evidence do we have in support of the hypothesis? Are there
facts that can be accounted for more easily in a syntax=hierarchy model?

- How do we reconcile the hypothesis with the strict ordering requirements that
some languages appear to have (e.g. SVO in English)?

- Is there evidence against the hypothesis? For example, it has been argued that
there are precedence restrictions on binding, that linear order determines
first-reading quantifier scope, or that coordination operates on linear strings.

Tied to these are questions concerning the derivation of linear order:

- How can linear order be derived from a hierarchical structure?

- Does the LCA provide us with a helpful insight into linearization, or do we
need linearization parameters? Or is a combination of both preferable?

- Where exactly in the grammar does linearization take place? Is it the first
step from syntax to PF, or does it take place in the phonology proper?

- How do we deal with cases where linear order seems to be absent, e.g. in cases
of simultaneous realization in sign languages? Can we accommodate such facts in
other ways (e.g. through morphology) or do they compel us to adopt a
substantially different view of linearization?

Papers dealing with these and related questions are invited for 30 (25+5) or 60
(50+10) minute talks. One page abstracts (A4 or Letter, 12pt Times) with
possibly an additional page for examples, figures and references, should be
submitted before 15 August 2009, through LINGUIST List's EasyAbs facility at
http://linguistlist.org/confcustom/DGfS-Lin2010 .

This workshop on linearization is held as part of the annual conference of the
German Society for Linguistics (DGfS), to be held at the Humboldt-University in
Berlin, 23-26 February 2010. Participation is open to all; the workshop language
will be English.

Workshop organizers: Marc Richards (University of Leipzig), Joost Kremers
(University of Frankfurt)

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.