Editor for this issue: Dan Parker
<danlinguistlist.org>
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.
Date: 08-Jun-2009 From: Karen Stanley <karen.stanleycpcc.edu> Subject: Longitudinal Studies & Grammar Instruction E-mail this message to a friend
I am working on a project that looks at grammar instruction (specifically within ESL/EFL in my case, but references dealing with other languages are very welcome).
I am looking for sources in the literature that discuss or provide research on the need for longitudinal studies (versus pre-test / brief period of instruction / post-test / later post-test) to determine the efficacy of grammar instruction.
To be completely clear: as well as any actual longitudinal studies, I am interested in sources that provide arguments for (or against) the need for longitudinal studies to adequately judge the usefulness of grammar instruction.
linguistlist.org>
E-mail this message to a friend
