* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 20.2194

Tue Jun 16 2009

Qs: Language as a Diagnostic Criterion for Psychosis

Editor for this issue: Dan Parker <danlinguistlist.org>


We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.

In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.

To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
Directory
        1.    Veronika Koller, Language as a Diagnostic Criterion for Psychosis

Message 1: Language as a Diagnostic Criterion for Psychosis
Date: 16-Jun-2009
From: Veronika Koller <v.kollerlancs.ac.uk>
Subject: Language as a Diagnostic Criterion for Psychosis
E-mail this message to a friend

Dear colleagues,
Can anyone point me in the direction of studies on language and speech
patterns used in the diagnosis of psychotic illnesses? This could be
general discussions of diagnostic criteria from a linguistic or
psychological/psychiatric point of view, or reports on clinical trials. I
am particularly interested in schizophrenia.

Many thanks and best regards,
Veronika Koller

Linguistic Field(s): Applied Linguistics
                            Psycholinguistics

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue




Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.