LINGUIST List 20.2199|
Wed Jun 17 2009
Calls: Linguistic Theories, Phonology, Typology/Germany
Editor for this issue: Amy Brunett
LINGUIST is pleased to announce the launch of an exciting new feature: Easy Abstracts! Easy Abs is a free abstract submission and review facility designed to help conference organizers and reviewers accept and process abstracts online. Just go to: http://www.linguistlist.org/confcustom, and begin your conference customization process today! With Easy Abstracts, submission and review will be as easy as 1-2-3!
Prosodic Typology: State of the Art & Future Prospects
Message 1: Prosodic Typology: State of the Art & Future Prospects
From: René Schiering <renepunksinscience.org>
Subject: Prosodic Typology: State of the Art & Future Prospects
E-mail this message to a friend
Full Title: Prosodic Typology: State of the Art & Future Prospects
Short Title: Prosodic Typology
Date: 24-Feb-2010 - 26-Feb-2010
Location: Berlin, Germany
Contact Person: René Schiering
Meeting Email: < click here to access email >
Web Site: http://www2.hu-berlin.de/dgfs/
Linguistic Field(s): Linguistic Theories; Phonology; Typology
Call Deadline: 31-Aug-2009
The study of prosody is traditionally concerned with suprasegmental features such as stress, tone, intonation and quantity. More recently, its scope has been expanded to include any phonological phenomenon sensitive to the domains of the prosodic hierarchy (ranging from the syllable to the utterance). In the course of this development, a number of theoretical frameworks have been developed which make strong claims about possible prosodic systems and their architecture. While the predictions are clear, the cross-linguistic evidence is often less so, especially since too often generalizations are based on a narrow language sample from better-known European languages.
Call for Papers:
Phonologists, typologists, and experts on individual languages are invited to submit abstracts addressing, among others, the following key questions in prosodic typology:
1) Which phenomena should be subsumed under the term 'prosodic'? E.g. is it reasonable to treat stress domains on a par with segmental assimilation processes? (cf. Bickel et al. 2009)
2) Can existing descriptive frameworks capture the attested diversity in prosodic systems? E.g. does ToBI provide an adequate means for cross-linguistic comparison? (cf. Jun 2005)
3) Are phonological theories capable of handling typological variation? E.g. can derivational approaches which assign metrical grids before intonational pitch-accents account for cases like Kuot? (cf. Lindström & Remijsen 2005)
Abstracts should be anonymous and should not exceed 1 page in length (an additional page for data and/or references can be added). Please send your abstracts electronically in pdf- and doc- or rtf-format to renepunksinscience.org. Include your name, affiliation and the title of the abstract in the body of the e-mail.
The workshop is organized by Gabriele Müller and René Schiering (Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster). It takes place as part of the annual meeting of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft (German Linguistic Society, DGfS) in Berlin between February 24th and 26th, 2010: http://www2.hu-berlin.de/dgfs/. Presentations at multiple workshops during DGfS are generally not approved of.
Bickel, Balthasar, Kristine A. Hildebrandt & René Schiering (2009). The distribution of phonological word domains: A probabilistic typology. In Phonological Domains. Universals and Deviations, Janet Grijzenhout & Baris
Kabak (eds.), 47-74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Jun, Sun-Ah (ed.) (2005). Prosodic Typology. The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lindström, Eva and Bert Remijsen (2005). Aspects of the Prosody of Kuot, a Language where Intonation Ignores Stress. Linguistics 43: 839-870.
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.