* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 20.2325

Mon Jun 29 2009

TOC: Pragmatics 19/2 (2009)

Editor for this issue: Fatemeh Abdollahi <fatemehlinguistlist.org>

Directory
        1.    Ann Verhaert, Pragmatics Vol 19, No 2 (2009)

Message 1: Pragmatics Vol 19, No 2 (2009)
Date: 28-Jun-2009
From: Ann Verhaert <ann.verhaertipra.be>
Subject: Pragmatics Vol 19, No 2 (2009)
E-mail this message to a friend

Publisher: International Pragmatics Assoc.
http://www.ipra.be

Journal Title: Pragmatics
Volume Number: 19
Issue Number: 2
Issue Date: 2009


Main Text:

Pragmatics 19:2 (June 2009)

Christine Bocerean and Michel Musiol
Mutual understanding mechanism in verbal exchanges between carers and multiply-
disabled young people: An interaction structure analysis

Maicol Formentelli
Address strategies in a British academic setting

Carmen Garcia
¿Qué::? ¿cómo que te vas a casar? Congratulations and rapport management: A
case study of Peruvian Spanish speakers

Song Mei Lee-Wong
Discourse as communicative action: Validation of China’s new socio-cultural
paradigm Qiye Wenhua/‘enterprise culture’

Ana Cristina Macario Lopes
Justification: A coherence relation

Cindi L. Sturtzsreetharan
Ore and omae: Japanese men’s uses of first- and second-person pronouns

Tiia Tulviste and Boel De Geer
Autonomy orientation in Estonian and Swedish family interactions


Linguistic Field(s): Pragmatics

Subject Language(s): Estonian (est)
                            Japanese (jpn)
                            Spanish (spa)
                            Swedish (swe)

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue




Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.