LINGUIST List 20.2367
|
Thu Jul 02 2009
TOC: International Review of Pragmatics 1/1 (2009)
Editor for this issue: Fatemeh Abdollahi
<fatemeh linguistlist.org>
|
Directory
1. Erwin
Blok,
International Review of Pragmatics Vol 1, No 1 (2009)
Message 1: International Review of Pragmatics Vol 1, No 1 (2009)
|
Date: 02-Jul-2009
From: Erwin Blok <blok brill.nl>
Subject: International Review of Pragmatics Vol 1, No 1 (2009)
E-mail this message to a friend
Publisher: Brill
http://www.brill.nl
Journal Title: International Review of Pragmatics
Volume Number: 1
Issue Number: 1
Issue Date: 2009
Main Text:
To celebrate the launch of the new journal International Review of Pragmatics, you can access the first issue online for free at: http://brill.publisher.ingentaconnect.com/content/brill/irp Table of Contents Editorial Note pp. 1-2(2) Articles Title: WJ-40: Implicature, truth, and meaning Author: Horn, Laurence R. pp. 3-34(32) Title: The Explicit/Implicit Distinction in Pragmatics and the Limits of Explicit Communication Author: Carston, Robyn pp. 35-62(28) Title: On Three Theories of Implicature: Default Theory, Relevance Theory and Minimalism Author: Borg, Emma pp. 63-83(21) Title: Q-Phenomena, I-Phenomena and Impliciture: Some Experimental Pragmatics Authors: Garrett, Merrill; Harnish, Robert M. pp. 84-117(34) Title: Neo-Gricean Pragmatics and the Lexicon Author: Huang, Yan pp. 118-153(36) Title: Inferentialism and the Compositionality of Meaning Author: Peregrin, Jaroslav pp. 154-181(28) Title: Towards an Alternative Relevance-Theoretic Approach to Interjections Author: Cruz, Manuel Padilla pp. 182-206(25) Notes on Contributors pp. 207-209(3)
Linguistic Field(s):
Cognitive Science
Discourse Analysis
General Linguistics
Philosophy of Language
Pragmatics
Text/Corpus Linguistics
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|