* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 20.2396

Sat Jul 04 2009

TOC: Phonology 26/1 (2009)

Editor for this issue: Hannah Morales <hannahlinguistlist.org>

        1.    Daniel Davies, Phonology Vol 26, No 1 (2009)

Message 1: Phonology Vol 26, No 1 (2009)
Date: 04-Jul-2009
From: Daniel Davies <ddaviescambridge.org>
Subject: Phonology Vol 26, No 1 (2009)
E-mail this message to a friend

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Journal Title: Phonology
Volume Number: 26
Issue Number: 1
Issue Date: 2009

Main Text:

Introduction: Phonological models and experimental data
Andries W. Coetzee, René Kager, Joe Pater

Learning Lexical Indexation
Andries W. Coetzee

Linking Speech Errors and Phonological Grammars: Insights from Harmonic Grammar
Matthew Goldrick, Robert Daland

Syllabification in Moroccan Arabic: Evidence from patterns of temporal stability
in articulation
Jason Shaw, Adamantios I. Gafos, Philip Hoole, Chakir Zeroual

The Harmonic Mind: From neural computation to optimality-theoretic grammar.
Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Joe Pater

Syllabification Patterns in Arabic Dialects: Long segments and mora sharing –
Jason Shaw, Adamantios Gafos, Philip Hoole, Chakir Zeroual

Greek wh-Questions and the Phonology of Intonation
Amalia Arvaniti, D. Robert Ladd

Listeners' Knowledge of Phonological Universals: Evidence from nasal clusters
Iris Berent, Tracy Lennertz, Paul Smolensky, Vered Vaknin-Nusbaum

Feature-Based Generalisation as a Source of Gradient Acceptability
Adam Albright

PHO Volume 26 Issue 1 Cover and Back Matter
PHO Volume 26 Issue 1 Cover and Front Matter

Linguistic Field(s): Phonology

Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.