LINGUIST List 20.2506
|
Wed Jul 15 2009
Diss: Historical Ling/Syntax/Typology: Chin: 'The Verb GIVE and the...'
Editor for this issue: Di Wdzenczny
<di linguistlist.org>
|
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Andy
Chin,
The Verb GIVE and the Double-object Construction in Cantonese in Synchronic, Diachronic and Typological Perspectives
Message 1: The Verb GIVE and the Double-object Construction in Cantonese in Synchronic, Diachronic and Typological Perspectives
|
Date: 14-Jul-2009
From: Andy Chin <hkseattlegmail.com>
Subject: The Verb GIVE and the Double-object Construction in Cantonese in Synchronic, Diachronic and Typological Perspectives
 E-mail this message to a friend
Institution: University of Washington
Program: Department of Linguistics
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2009
Author: Andy C. Chin
Dissertation Title: The Verb GIVE and the Double-object Construction in Cantonese in Synchronic, Diachronic and Typological Perspectives
Linguistic Field(s):
Historical Linguistics
Syntax
Typology
Subject Language(s): Chinese, Yue (yue)
Dissertation Director:
Anne O. Yue-Hashimoto
Dissertation Abstract:
This dissertation examines the double-object verb [pei] 畀 and the
double-object construction in Cantonese in diachronic, synchronic and
typological perspectives.
Apart from being a verb, [pei] 畀 also performs a number of syntactic
functions as a result of grammaticalization. Our survey on other Chinese
dialects and genetically unrelated languages shows that some of these
functions (i.e. as an indirect object marker and a causative verb) are
cross-linguistically attested while some (i.e. as a passive marker and a
verb introducing instruments) are not. The chronological development of
these functions in Cantonese will also be examined.
As for the indirect object marker function of [pei] 畀, we propose that two
types of indirect object markers can be identified in Cantonese, which are
cross-linguistically attested: The go-type and the give-type. The former is
performed by directional verbs such as 過 in the 19th century Cantonese
dialects while the latter is played by the double-object verb [pei] 畀 in
modern Cantonese. Our survey on the oracle-bone inscriptions and other
dialects shows that the go-type usually predates the give-type.
With reference to the pre-modern Cantonese dialect materials and the recent
field work data on the Conghua dialect, we will explore the syntactic and
semantic factors contributing to the switchover from the go-type to the
give-type.
The major syntactic construction in which GIVE involves is the double-object
construction. Two typological patterns in terms of the word order of the
objects are found across the Chinese dialects: IO DO and DO IO. The former
is found in the Northern dialects while the latter in most of the Southern
dialects. Over the last two decades, the non-native IO DO word order
pattern has been gaining its ascendency in Hong Kong Cantonese due to the
increasing influence of Putonghua and Modern Standard Chinese. A field work
with 40 native speakers of Hong Kong Cantonese was carried out to find out
the degree of usage and acceptance of the non-native patterns. We will also
compare the results among the speakers in terms of age and occupation,
which are correlated to their exposure to Putonghua or Modern Standard Chinese.
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|
