LINGUIST List 20.2738
|
Mon Aug 10 2009
Disc: Role of TOEFL Exam in Language Learning
Editor for this issue: Catherine Adams
<catherin linguistlist.org>
|
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. P
J,
Role of TOEFL Exam in Language Learning
Message 1: Role of TOEFL Exam in Language Learning
|
Date: 30-Jul-2009
From: P J <happypedro gmail.com>
Subject: Role of TOEFL Exam in Language Learning
E-mail this message to a friend
It would be very helpful if anyone can provide answers to questions on the role of the TOEFL exam in actual language learning. I am asking because the university where I teach includes the TOEFL as 20% of their final class grade, and also requires a score of 550 on the TOEFL to graduate. Both of which, it seems to me, is severely wrongheaded. Language is organic and complex, not something to be measured by an arbitrary grid. At most, it seems to me, the TOEFL is a standardized indicator of proficiency in understanding a highly contextualized language use, and it is not that good an indicator either. 1. What percentage score increase in the TOEFL is reasonable to expect per each hour of class time studying English? 2. How is the TOEFL accurate and useful, in any way, toward improving language learning? In other words: how effective is teaching to the TOEFL in increasing language knowledge/capacity? 3. Is it wise to include a TOEFL score as part of a student's grade? Does it motivate them in the right ways and actually achieve good results? 4. What are the most effective ways (techniques, activities, emphasis, etc) to teach to the TOEFL so as to have students achieve the highest possible score increase over a 15 week (75 hour) English class? Thoughts? Links? Research? Many thanks, Peter
Linguistic Field(s):
Applied Linguistics
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|