LINGUIST List 20.2753
|
Wed Aug 12 2009
Diss: Syntax/Text/Corpus Ling: Wu: 'Factors Affecting Relative...'
Editor for this issue: Di Wdzenczny
<di linguistlist.org>
|
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Fuyun
Wu,
Factors Affecting Relative Clause Processing in Mandarin
Message 1: Factors Affecting Relative Clause Processing in Mandarin
|
Date: 12-Aug-2009
From: Fuyun Wu <flyyunyungmail.com>
Subject: Factors Affecting Relative Clause Processing in Mandarin
 E-mail this message to a friend
Institution: University of Southern California
Program: Department of Linguistics
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2009
Author: Fuyun Wu
Dissertation Title: Factors Affecting Relative Clause Processing in Mandarin
Linguistic Field(s):
Syntax
Text/Corpus Linguistics
Subject Language(s): Chinese, Mandarin (cmn)
Dissertation Director:
Elaine Andersen
Elsi Kaiser
Bosco Tjan
Audrey Li
Andrew Simpson
Dissertation Abstract:
Current models of sentence processing make contrasting predictions
regarding the processing of head-final relative clauses (RCs) in Chinese,
but existing research has found mixed results. It is not yet clear (i)
whether subject-extracted RCs are easier to process than object-extracted
RCs; and (ii) whether classifiers in a dislocated position before the RC
can facilitate processing. This dissertation investigates how extraction
site, animacy configuration, and classifier positioning guide real-time
parsing of Chinese RCs. Assuming a correlation between frequency of
occurrence and ease of processing, I analyzed the frequency pattern of
these factors in the Chinese Treebank 5.0 corpus, then formulated and
experimentally tested hypotheses to account for the patterns observed.
Chapter 1 and 2 introduce the issues and review the relevant literature.
Chapter 3 presents a corpus analysis, focusing on extraction type
(subject-extracted vs. object-extracted) and animacy of the head and
embedded nouns. The results show that subject-extracted RCs are more
frequent than object-extracted RCs and suggest three Animacy Preference
Constraints (APCs): (i) head nouns that are RC subjects tend to be animate;
(ii) head nouns that are RC objects tend to be inanimate; (iii) in both
cases, the animacy of the head and embedded nouns tend to contrast.
Chapter 4 presents three self-paced reading experiments to test whether the
hypothesized APCs influence ease of RC parsing. The results show that
animacy configurations modulate the processing load induced by Chinese RCs:
subject-extracted RCs are easier to process than object-extracted RCs when
the animacy configuration is inversely contrastive (i.e., RC subject =
inanimate, RC object = animate).
Chapter 5 focuses on classifiers as possible cues for upcoming RCs. The
corpus reveals an asymmetrical pattern of classifier distribution in
subject-extracted and object-extracted RCs. I propose two processing
principles related to anticipatory processing and lexical access. These
principles are supported by one eye-tracking and two reading-time
experiments. Results suggest that pre-RC classifiers help the human parsing
system identify head-final RC structures efficiently.
I consider the findings in light of four major theoretical accounts, and
suggest that the parsing of Chinese RCs best fits the probabilistic,
expectation-based constraint-satisfaction model.
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|
