LINGUIST List 20.2797
|
Mon Aug 17 2009
Calls: Syntax/Germany
Editor for this issue: Amy Brunett
<brunett linguistlist.org>
|
LINGUIST is pleased to announce the launch of an exciting new feature: Easy Abstracts! Easy Abs is a free abstract submission and review facility designed to help conference organizers and reviewers accept and process abstracts online. Just go to: http://www.linguistlist.org/confcustom, and begin your conference customization process today! With Easy Abstracts, submission and review will be as easy as 1-2-3!
|
Directory
1. Joost
Kremers,
Linearization Workshop (DGfS 2010)
Message 1: Linearization Workshop (DGfS 2010)
|
Date: 17-Aug-2009
From: Joost Kremers <linearization2010fastmail.fm>
Subject: Linearization Workshop (DGfS 2010)
 E-mail this message to a friend
Full Title: Linearization Workshop (DGfS 2010)
Short Title: Lin2010
Date: 23-Feb-2010 - 26-Feb-2010
Location: Berlin, Germany
Contact Person: Joost Kremers
Meeting Email: < click here to access email >
Web Site: http://user.uni-frankfurt.de/~kremers/DGfS2010-Linearization.html
Linguistic Field(s): Syntax
Call Deadline: 01-Sep-2009
Meeting Description:
This workshop deals with the question of linearization, the issue of relating a hierarchical syntactic structure with a (predominantly) linear phonological structure.
This workshop is held as part of the annual conference of the German Society for Linguistics (DGfS), to be held at the Humboldt-University in Berlin, 23-26 February 2010. Participation is open to all; the workshop language will be English.
Workshop Organizers:
Marc Richards (University of Leipzig)
Joost Kremers (University of Frankfurt)
Invited Speaker:
Jan-Wouter Zwart (University of Groningen, The Netherlands)
Call for Papers:
In current minimalist thinking, syntactic representations are strictly hierarchical and do not contain any information on the linear order of terminal elements. Such an assumption obviously raises a number of questions, which this workshop aims to address. Firstly, questions arise over the motivation of this hypothesis, such as the following:
- What empirical evidence do we have in support of the hypothesis? Are there facts that can be accounted for more easily in a syntax=hierarchy model?
- How do we reconcile the hypothesis with the strict ordering requirements that some languages appear to have (e.g. SVO in English)?
- Is there evidence against the hypothesis? For example, it has been argued that there are precedence restrictions on binding, that linear order determines first-reading quantifier scope, or that coordination operates on linear strings.
Tied to these are questions concerning the derivation of linear order:
- How can linear order be derived from a hierarchical structure?
- Does the LCA provide us with a helpful insight into linearization, or do we need linearization parameters? Or is a combination of both preferable?
- Where exactly in the grammar does linearization take place? Is it the first step from syntax to PF, or does it take place in the phonology proper?
- How do we deal with cases where linear order seems to be absent, e.g. in cases of simultaneous realization in sign languages? Can we accommodate such facts in other ways (e.g. through morphology) or do they compel us to adopt a substantially different view of linearization?
We invite submissions for 30 (25+5) or 60 (50+10) minute talks dealing with these and related questions from a formal perspective. (Not restricted to minimalism, other frameworks are equally welcome.) One page abstracts (A4 or Letter, 12pt Times) with possibly an additional page for examples, figures and references should be submitted before 15 August 2009, through Linguist List's EasyAbs facility at:
http://linguistlist.org/confcustom/DGfS-Lin2010
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|
Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us
While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|
