LINGUIST List 20.2820
|
Wed Aug 19 2009
Diss: Semantics/Syntax: Troseth: 'Adicity and Reference: Middle...'
Editor for this issue: Di Wdzenczny
<di linguistlist.org>
|
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at
http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Erika
Troseth,
Adicity and Reference: Middle voice and its components
Message 1: Adicity and Reference: Middle voice and its components
|
Date: 19-Aug-2009
From: Erika Troseth <erika.troseth gmail.com>
Subject: Adicity and Reference: Middle voice and its components
E-mail this message to a friend
Institution: City University of New York
Program: Linguistics Program
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2009
Author: Erika Troseth
Dissertation Title: Adicity and Reference: Middle voice and its components
Linguistic Field(s):
Semantics
Syntax
Dissertation Director:
Robert Fiengo
Chritina Tortora
William McClure
Dissertation Abstract:
In this thesis I provide an analysis of middle voice sentences (as in The book reads well, El libro se lee bien, Das Buch liest sich leicht) in which the characterizing feature of middles is a mismatch with respect to predicate adicity and the number of argument expression occurrences in the syntactic structure. Throughout the thesis I rely on the distinction between linguistic types and linguistic tokens. Thus, although it might rightly be said, when considering orthography or phonology, that in the sentence Lolita si legge facilemente, there are two items: si and Lolita, we can also rightly say, when considering syntax or semantics, that together si and Lolita constitute a single abstract object. A significant feature of the analysis is indeed the proposal that the syntactic subject of middles and the weak reflexive together formally constitute a single syntactic object. The analysis predicts the various properties of the weak reflexive that appears in many languages' middle voice sentences, including their Case, referential, and agreement properties. Taking the aforementioned mismatch to be the core characterization of middles predicts that they are morphologically and semantically less restricted than previously thought. Data presented in the thesis support this conclusion.
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|