LINGUIST List 20.284
|
Thu Jan 29 2009
Qs: Statistics of English Vocabulary
Editor for this issue: Dan Parker
<dan linguistlist.org>
|
We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was
instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate.
In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.
To post to LINGUIST, use our convenient web form at http://linguistlist.org/LL/posttolinguist.html.
|
Directory
1. Richard
Hudson,
Statistics of English Vocabulary
Message 1: Statistics of English Vocabulary
|
Date: 28-Jan-2009
From: Richard Hudson <dick ling.ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Statistics of English Vocabulary
E-mail this message to a friend
Dear All, I wonder if someone could help me with two statistical question about the vocabulary of English (as found in corpus work - at this point I'm not asking for figures for individual speakers, though they would be really fascinating to know if anyone has them). Q1. How many morphemes are there? (I'm sure I've seen a figure somewhere, the point being, of course, that it's much smaller than the number of lexemes (lemmas, lexical items). Q2. What percentage of the total vocabulary belongs to the various major word classes? Better still, how does this percentage vary with frequency? (I assume for example that rare words tend to be nouns.) If there's enough response I'll summarise back to the list. Best wishes, Dick Hudson
Linguistic Field(s):
Text/Corpus Linguistics
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|
|

Please report any bad links or misclassified data
LINGUIST Homepage | Read
LINGUIST | Contact us

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.
|
|