* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
LINGUIST List logo Eastern Michigan University Wayne State University *
* People & Organizations * Jobs * Calls & Conferences * Publications * Language Resources * Text & Computer Tools * Teaching & Learning * Mailing Lists * Search *
* *
LINGUIST List 20.2920

Sat Aug 29 2009

Books: Phonology/Syntax: Werle

Editor for this issue: Hannah Morales <hannahlinguistlist.org>


Links to the websites of all LINGUIST's supporting publishers are available at the end of this issue.
Directory
        1.    Anisa Schardl, Word, Phrase, and Clitic Prosody in Bosnian, Serbian, and Croatian: Werle

Message 1: Word, Phrase, and Clitic Prosody in Bosnian, Serbian, and Croatian: Werle
Date: 28-Aug-2009
From: Anisa Schardl <glsalinguist.umass.edu>
Subject: Word, Phrase, and Clitic Prosody in Bosnian, Serbian, and Croatian: Werle
E-mail this message to a friend

Title: Word, Phrase, and Clitic Prosody in Bosnian, Serbian, and
Croatian
Published: 2009
Publisher: Graduate Linguistic Students' Association, Umass
                http://glsa.hypermart.net/

Book URL: https://www.createspace.com/Customer/EStore.do?id=3386574

Author: Adam Werle
Paperback: ISBN: 1448600421 9781448600427 Pages: 324 Price: U.S. $ 16.99
Abstract:

I investigate the phonology of prosodic clitics - independent syntactic
words not parsed as independent prosodic words - in Bosnian, Serbian, and
Croatian. I ask, first, how clitics are organized into prosodic structures,
and second, how this is determined by the grammar. Following Zec (1997,
2005), I look at several clitic categories, including negation,
prepositions, complementizers, conjunctions, and second-position clitics.

Based on a reanalysis of word accent (Browne and McCawley 1965, Inkelas and
Zec 1988, Zec 1999), I argue that in some cases where a preposition,
complementizer, or conjunction fails to realize accent determined by a
following word, it is not a proclitic - that is, prosodified with the
following word - but rather a free clitic parsed directly by a phonological
phrase.

Conversely, the second-position clitics are not always enclitic - that is,
prosodified with a preceding word - but are sometimes free. Their
second-position word order results not from enclisis, but from the
avoidance of free clitics at phrase edges, where they would interfere with
the alignment of phonological phrases to prosodic words.

Regarding the determination of clisis by the grammar, I argue for an
interface constraint approach (Selkirk 1995, Truckenbrodt 1995), whereby
prosodic structures are built according to general constraints on their
well-formedness, and on their interface to syntactic structures. I contrast
this with the subcategorization approach, which sees clisis as specified
for each clitic (Klavans 1982, Radanovic-Kocic 1988, Zec and Inkelas 1990).

The comparison across clitic categories provides key support for the
interface constraint approach, showing that their prosody depends on their
syntactic configurations and phonological shapes, rather than on arbitrary
subcategorizations. Prosodic differences across categories are a derivative
effect of their configuration in the clause, and of the division of the
clause into phonological phrases.

The relevance of phonological phrases consists in how their edges
discourage some kinds of clisis, blocking, for example, proclisis of
complementizers and conjunctions to their complements. Free clisis is
disfavored at phrase edges, producing the second-position effect. Thus, the
interface constraint approach leads to a unified account of word, phrase,
and clitic prosody.

Linguistic Field(s): Phonology
                            Syntax

Subject Language(s): Bosnian (bos)
                            Croatian (hrv)
                            Serbian (srp)

Written In: English (eng )

See this book announcement on our website:
http://linguistlist.org/get-book.html?BookID=43179


Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

-------------- Major Supporters --------------
Brill http://www.brill.nl
Cambridge Scholars Publishing http://www.c-s-p.org
Cambridge University Press http://us.cambridge.org
Cascadilla Press http://www.cascadilla.com/
Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd http://www.continuumbooks.com
Edinburgh University Press http://www.eup.ed.ac.uk/
Elsevier Ltd http://www.elsevier.com/linguistics
Emerald Group Publishing Limited http://www.emeraldinsight.com/
Equinox Publishing Ltd http://www.equinoxpub.com/
European Language Resources Association - ELRA http://www.elra.info.
Georgetown University Press http://www.press.georgetown.edu
Hodder Education http://www.hoddereducation.co.uk
John Benjamins http://www.benjamins.com/
Lincom GmbH http://www.lincom.eu
MIT Press http://mitpress.mit.edu/
Mouton de Gruyter http://www.mouton-publishers.com
Multilingual Matters http://www.multilingual-matters.com/
Narr Francke Attempto Verlag GmbH + Co. KG http://www.narr.de/
Oxford University Press http://www.oup.com/us
Palgrave Macmillan http://www.palgrave.com
Peter Lang AG http://www.peterlang.com
Rodopi http://www.rodopi.nl/
Routledge (Taylor and Francis) http://www.routledge.com/
Springer http://www.springer.com
University of Toronto Press http://www.utpjournals.com/
Wiley-Blackwell http://www.wiley.com

------------- Other Supporting Publishers -------------
Association of Editors of the Journal of Portuguese Linguistics http://www.fl.ul.pt/revistas/JPL/JPLweb.htm
Graduate Linguistic Students' Association, Umass http://glsa.hypermart.net/
International Pragmatics Assoc. http://www.ipra.be
Langues et Linguistique http://y.ennaji.free.fr/fr/
Linguistic Association of Finland http://www.ling.helsinki.fi/sky/
Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics / Landelijke - LOT http://www.lotpublications.nl/
Pacific Linguistics http://pacling.anu.edu.au/
SIL International http://www.ethnologue.com/bookstore.asp
St. Jerome Publishing Ltd http://www.stjerome.co.uk
Utrecht institute of Linguistics http://www-uilots.let.uu.nl/




Please report any bad links or misclassified data

LINGUIST Homepage | Read LINGUIST | Contact us

NSF Logo

While the LINGUIST List makes every effort to ensure the linguistic relevance of sites listed
on its pages, it cannot vouch for their contents.