Date: 28-Jan-2009
From: Katalin Balogné Bérces <bbkati yahoo.com>
Subject: Animal Names Used in Addressing People
E-mail this message to a friend
Query for this summary posted in LINGUIST Issue:
19.3544
Dear Linguists, Quite a few weeks ago I posted a query in which, on behalf of a student of mine, Zsuzsa Szamosfalvi, I asked you to fill in a questionnaire about animal names used to address people in English. We received a generous lot of answers, for which we are extremely grateful to all of you, whom we don't have the space to list. But here is a summary of Zsuzsa's preliminary results, written by her, just to give you some feedback on what you've become involved in: ''I decided to deal with this topic after having read Halupka-Resetar and Radic (2003), who carried out a research on ''Animal names used in addressing people in Serbian''. Although I listed different animal names in my questionnaire, I was working with the same method they used. My questionnaire has been completed by some 45 native English-speaking people from Great-Britain, Ireland, the United States and Canada so far. In the first and second places in my recent analysis I concentrated on whether the given animal vocatives are used to express affection or abuse and whether these animal names are used to address a male or a female person. Finally, I concentrated on the semantico-pragmatic motivations of people using particular animal vocatives. It was rather interesting to realize which animal names are the most frequently used ones in terms of addressing people. I listed 42 animal names in my questionnaire, in this case I intend to deal with the 15 most frequent ones. These are in order of frequency: 1. pig, 2. chick(en), 3. dog/puppy, 4. cow, 5. monkey, 6. hen, 7. rat, 8. turkey, 9. mouse, 10. snake, 11. cat/kitten, 12. fox, 13. lamb, 14. vixen, 15. worm. These preliminary results show that animal vocatives are more often used as expressing a negative relation towards the addressee, rather than a positive one. This is also confirmed by the fact that among these 15 animal names we can find only one, ‘lamb’, which is exclusively used affectionately, thus it has no abusive meaning at all. All the other animal vocatives are either used to express an exclusively abusive manner, just like pig, cow, rat, snake, worm, or to express both an abusive and an affectionate manner, just like chick(en), dog/puppy, monkey, hen, turkey, mouse, cat/kitten, fox, vixen. Most of the mentioned 15 animal vocatives are used to address both a male and a female person. As there are 3 animal names that are exclusively used to address a female person, just like cow, hen, vixen, there is not a single one, which is exclusively used to describe a male addressee. All the other animal vocatives are used to address both a male and a female person. Finally, it is interesting to see the semantico-pragmatic motivations of people using particular animal vocatives, in other words, the different meanings of the expressions the animal vocatives transfer. I worked with the same classification that was used by S. Halupka-Resetar and B. Radic. On the basis of this classification I divided the 15 listed animal names into the following four groups: appearance, eating habits, intelligence and character. Therefore, cow and vixen are listed under appearance, pig is under eating habits, fox and turkey are under intelligence, while the group character includes cat/kitten, hen, snake, worm, monkey, dog/puppy, mouse, chicken, lamb and rat. In my further analysis I would like to devote much more attention to the morphosyntactic structures in which the animal vocatives are used and the typical situations that usually provoke such occurrences.'' We are grateful for all the help we've got. Katalin Balogné Bérces and Zsuzsa Szamosfalvi, Péter Pázmány Catholic University, Hungary Reference: Halupka-Resetar, Sabina and Radic, Biljana, 2003. Animal names used in addressing people in Serbian. In: Journal of Pragmatics 35 (2003) pp. 1891-1902.
Linguistic Field(s):
Sociolinguistics
Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
|